self delete

[nofurylike]

[havocmom]

1. Nixon's ghost is a busy bastard

Anyone besides me expecting a "Saturday Night Massacre" redux?

[EFerrari]

5. Hoping, anyway. n/t

[havocmom]

6. Huh? Hoping for what?

The Saturday Night Massacre was nasty-assed Imperial Presidential bullshit to the ninth power. You're not hoping the prosecuters now get the ax are you? It's late and I am easily confused

[EFerrari]

12. It is late, lol.

I meant, (taking both feet out of mouth) that this gets AS BIG AS POSSIBLE.

(And that there is some general around, when Bush wants to surround the White House, to interdict his looney commands -- as they did with Nixon.)

[havocmom]

14. Big would be good. But I do not have faith in THIS congress

to take action against blatant abuse of power like the one from the good ol days ;) of Nixon. Sadly, I do not see enough honor in enough members of that body to expect them to grid their loins and take these criminals down.

Hoping I am wrong, but not holding my breath waiting for REAL patriotism from this particular group.

[EFerrari]

16. It won't be the congress. It will be the people.

Congress is hopelessly corrupt. Sad to say, but there it is.

Mostly, I remember how we shut down the Viet Nam war. It was really hard, but we got it done.

Let's get it done. :hi:

[ngGale]

2. Yep...n/t

[greyl]

3. This is not supported by anything.

You guys are going overboard. One thread was enough.

(b) Examination of sealed exhibits and proceedings. Except as provided in the following subsections to this rule, sealed exhibits may not be examined.

(1) Examination of sealed matters. For the purpose of this rule, "examination" includes reading, viewing, photocopying, photographing, disclosing, or manipulating the documents in any way.

(2) Prior to authentication. Prior to authentication of the record by the military judge, sealed materials may not be examined in the absence of an order from the military judge based on good cause shown.

(3) Authentication through action. After authentication and prior to disposition of the record of trial pursuant to Rule for Courts-Martial 1111, sealed materials may not be examined in the absence of an order from the military judge upon a showing of good cause at a post-trial Article 39a session directed by the Convening Authority.

(4) Reviewing and appellate authorities.

(A) Reviewing and appellate authorities may examine sealed matters when those authorities determine that such action is reasonably necessary to a proper fulfillment of their responsibilities under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, governing directives, instructions, regulations, applicable rules for practice and procedure, or rules of professional responsibility.

(B) Reviewing and appellate authorities shall not, however, disclose sealed matter or information in the absence of:

(i) Prior authorization of the Judge Advocate General in the case of review under Rule for Courts-Martial 1201(b); or

(ii) Prior authorization of the appellate court before which a case is pending review under Rules for Courts-Martial 1203 and 1204.

(C) In those cases in which review is sought or pending before the United States Supreme Court, authorization to disclose sealed materials or information shall be obtained under that Court's rules of practice and procedure.

(D) The authorizing officials in paragraph (B)(ii) above may place conditions on authorized disclosures in order to minimize the disclosure.

(E) For purposes of this rule, reviewing and appellate authorities are limited to:

(i) Judge advocates reviewing records pursuant to Rule for Courts-Martial 1112;

(ii) Officers and attorneys in the office of the Judge Advocate General reviewing records pursuant to Rule for Courts-Martial 1201(b);

(iii) Appellate government counsel;

(iv) Appellate defense counsel;

(v) Appellate judges of the Courts of Criminal Appeals and their professional staffs;

(vi) The judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and their professional staffs;

(vii) The Justices of the United States Supreme Court and their professional staffs; and

(viii)Any other court of competent jurisdiction."

[havocmom]

4. yeah, yer prolly right. Nothing to see here. Hey, who should run in 2008?

What sorta bumper stickers shall we make? ;)

[greyl]

13. Clint Eastwood, Susan Sarandon, Clark, Sharpton, Warner etc

Just no Lieberman, please. :)

[havocmom]

15. Cute, but my point was a little more barbed than a real question

Jesus Christ wouldn't stand a chance unless we manage to force clean elections again, and that is my point. These crooks are not gonna give up and retire peacefully. They count the votes and their lives now depend on it staying that way.

We do agree on Lieberman though ;)

[greyl]

17. Ahh, gotcha.

Yes, you bring up an authentic cause of focus for non-braindead DUers.
:)

[symbolman]

7. I've got one that trumps ALL these words

It's called the FIRST AMENDMENT.

FUCK YOU BUSHOLINI and all the Pigs you rode in on..

[havocmom]

8. What the devil is with this editing out posts AFTER people respond

shit going on tonight? Nasty and rude, it is.

[greyl]

9. Yeah, what the hell?

Here's the EO in question, btw:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/10/20051014-1.html

[havocmom]

10. Thank you for reposting the link since the OP edited it out

thus leaving the discussion hanging on thin air.

Gads, second thread tonight that I have seen that done in. WTF? Just plain rude!

[greyl]

11. You're welcome: Here's the link to one of the other threads...

Link

[rasputin1952]

18. Locking

It is difficult, in the best case scenario, to respond to an OP that has been deleted by the poster. Please feel free to reopen this discussion with a viable OP.

Thank you for your understanding.