Is it sexist, or out of bounds, to ask if the tone of her notes to Bush, and her speeches, should place her judgment, maturity, and fitness for the Court, into question? Is the LA Times skirting this question with this article today, the responses to which have included concern by posters that this woman's state of mind could make it impossible for her to think and act independently on the Court?
LAT: In Speeches, Miers Heaped Praise on President
By David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer
WASHINGTON — Critics have poked fun at the effusive greeting card messages that Harriet E. Miers used to send to then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush and that have become public following her nomination to the Supreme Court.
The glowing remarks were not limited to greeting cards, according to the texts of recent speeches and other public remarks released Monday by lawmakers.
"President Bush's vision, his discipline and relentless dedication, his hard work and his likability have made it possible for all of us in this room to participate in the great enterprise we know as the United States," she told a group of White House interns in June....
***
In one speech, she spoke of Bush's little-known talent as an editor. "All those editing skills, and you would think the president was a lawyer himself. He works so constantly. We'll keep an eye out and make sure he does not start keeping track of his billable hours," she told the interns. "Time and time again, it seemed, the president was able to zero in on the most difficult aspect of an issue and provide exactly the direction needed. Guess that is why he is the president."
She also spoke of how Bush hugged relatives of a soldier who had been killed in Iraq.
"This is a scene I will never forget for the selfless caring and value and sacrifice it depicted. So much of what is great about America is wrapped up in one big hug."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-praise18oct18,0,3218543.story?coll=la-story-footer&track=morenews