Freepers here--please D.U. some intellegence to them here:

[ray of light]

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/3573#comment-25839

Particularly the one marked "Sheehan"

[whatever4]

1. Done

Thanks, that was fun :)

[mirandapriestly]

2. Ugh, are people really THAT DUMB??? nt

[Mira]

3. I did but it's not showing up! ?!?!?!

[EstimatedProphet]

5. Neither is mine

[sui generis]

9. holy crap good thing I looked up before I posted

didn't realize these were disruptors - I thought it was the whole site.

I decided not to post my decidedly warlike reply, and as a plus, the FBI and D'OH Security won't have to visit me at work.

oy.

What kind of America do these people want to live in? We just installed an Islamic Republic in a middle eastern country after killing tens of thousands of civilians at the cost of the lives of over 2,000 Americans.

And now they want to round up people who protest this absurd "war" and "convict and shoot" us? Let them try.

I'll just stop there. Let them fucking try.

[EstimatedProphet]

11. Now it is

[ray of light]

6. i think it says

to give it 15 minutes if you post anonymously

[LSK]

4. i posted this but i dont see it

Bush violated the Congressional approval to invade Iraq:

"SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that--
(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and
(2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_bills&docid=f:hj114enr.txt.pdf

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.J.RES.114:

http://www.yourcongress.com/ViewArticle.asp?article_id=2686

NONE OF THESE CONDITIONS WERE MET. Iraq was no threat to the US and Saddam was fully cooperating with inspections.

ILLEGAL WAR.

[ray of light]

7. I think i saw it posted.

[WritingIsMyReligion]

10. Yeah, I saw that one. Nice post. :D n/t

[LSK]

12. i see it now, i guess there is a time lag

I dare any freeps to refute that!

[WritingIsMyReligion]

8. Fucking asshats, they are

How the HELL can anybody be so stupid??

The one that really gets me is the Freep who's like: "Telling her to shut up isn't violating her First Ammendment rights."

Uh, YEAH, genius, it is.

[ray of light]

13. freepers all over there--please teach them intellegent facts!

[ray of light]

14. actually the freeps are scared to death! they're crawling

out of the woodwork at http://www.afterdowningstreet.org