Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm convinced Bush is now in danger too.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:28 PM
Original message
I'm convinced Bush is now in danger too.
That's why they are trying to toss Cheney to the wolves.

They are in survival mode, which means that Fitzgerald might/may/must have the goods on the President.

They wouldn't toss Cheney to save Rove, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. We can hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't think so
the loyalty is so great in this administration that these people would gladly "take one for Bush*" because they will be rewarded..


and....

they know all too well the consequences of NOT protecting Bush*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. The loyalty is not that great.
And an impeached President has no power.

If Fitzgerald has enough to recommend impeachment, congressmen will choose their jobs over backstabbing Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. An impeached President has no power but the heir to
the Bush financial empire does. He's not there because he's presidential material, he's there because he's one of them. We may not survive this administration, but it's not like the man has to worry about lining up a job if this one falls through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Assuming he retains his freedom. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Shoot, criminals run drug empires from within prisons, and he
won't even go to one of the real prisons. They'll check him into the Ritz or some such place and he'll be receiving courtiers nonstop, except for during his beauty rest, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. I don't think it's up to Fitzgerald to recommend impeachment or not.
That's the House's job. I wouldn't count on hearing the word "impeachment" from anyone in political power just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I thought he could serve the House with a recommendation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. No. In fact, Starr's recommendation to impeach was widely seen as
overstepping (another of his many) bounds. And Fitzgerald does not have the same (sweeping) powers Starr had, in any case. On the other hand, Fitzgerald does have the power to issue criminal indictments, which could sting a whole lot more than mere impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Ahhh...I thought Fitzgerald could name Bush as an unindicted
co-conspirator and then recommend impeachment, but that's just something I read here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I read Will's post earlier and the only thing that I am afraid of now is..
that they won't get them all. We know it is going to be big. We know heads are gonna roll. But I want Bush too. I will be very disappointed if Bush doesn't go down also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I will too.
And the fact that the media is telegraphing a Cheney resignation says to me that they are trying to grab control of the situation before the entire group is destroyed. Like I said, they would never, ever toss Cheney for Rove. It's not a fair trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. There's one reason and one reason only to toss the Veep overboard
and that's to protect the guy in the big chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Exactly. They are terrified.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. More than terrified-it's over-if the fight w/pretensiousness it is hollow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I dunno -- someone could probably step into Cheney's place, but Satan...
only made one Karl Rove, and assigned him to George W. Bush (as I've said here often). Without that unholy alliance, what is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I can't imagine that Cheney would go down without a fight.
Cheney already freed Libby to go after Rove. We could be watching the greatest reciprocal backstabbing in history.

If the rumors that Cheney has been on the outs with Bush are true, who do you think is smarter, is more equipped to survive, is more likely to screw the other over?

I wonder if Cheney would swallow it and let Bush continue after destroying him.

????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Very good, very intriguing questions! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. And the other thing is Libby's note to Miller.
He told her that the Aspens are turning...he wasn't talking about against Cheney, his boss.

He was talking about against Bush.

He was bringing a media asset home with a pat on the back for a job well done...she protected Cheney as long as she could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. How about this scenario?
Bush pardons Cheney.

Bush resigns.

Cheney becomes President.

Cheney pardons Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Good, Mme. Defarge! Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. One hand washes the other. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
44. And the revolution begins at 9am the next day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. PNAC and the cabal will sacrifice Cheney, but not really. They have
Edited on Tue Oct-18-05 02:43 PM by higher class
no conscious. They are arrogant perverts of humanity. Cheney will get to make tons of money more legally. He doesn't care one tear what people think and PNAC doesn't either. The only ones who will care are a few Congressional leaders. Not Roberts. Not DeLay. Not Blunt. And a buncha others like them.

This is the reason - PNAC will just put in another of their founders in there to try to pull George's strings for the CEO's and the born agains and their Middle East, European, Asian, and Paraguayan friends. And Dick will go his pompous killing, dealing, thieving, lying way.

(CEO's includes stockholders.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. The CEO's have already sold out Bush.
Look at the media coverage. Look at the Aspen meeting.

They are washing their hands of this mess and finding someone new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. conscience
not conscious.

Although they do often appear to be unconscious...;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. You're right - too busy with the conspiracies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mosley Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. I am surprised that we are seeing such a media frenzy
over a story that has been pretty obvious for a couple of months
now. (Ever since Cooper testified)

It was obvious that once Cooper revealed the source of Rove and Libby, that it would have to at least look at Cheney. These
guys are hand in glove and one has to assume if Libby leaked, Cheney
knew about it.

However, the question is proof of that as a fact. Seems like Fitzgerald not likely to pursue such an allegation without real solid
proof.

Whatever else you can say, Cheney is the sitting VEEP. So, as the saying goes, if you strike at the king.... you better kill him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Welcome to DU, Mosley.
And you are right. That is the other reason.

Everyone knows Bush pushed to get into Iraq. He made the decision before the intelligence was in place. The DSM indicate that. Media reports show it.

Fitzgerald should not have far to look to link Bush's direct orders to falsify intelligence if someone has turned against him.

The question is, who has the gall to point the finger at Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. It does look like a plan, doesn't it?
1) Investigate the comparatively mundane Plame leak.

2) Pin it on the Vice President and Karl Rove, l'eminance grise of the Bush Presidency.

3) Get Cheney to resign.

4) Take advantage of the political backlash to secure gains in the House and the Senate.

5) Impeach President Bush, thus revoking any pardons he may issue to his underlings.

6) Send every last one of the bastards to jail forever.

Ah, but it is nice to dream, isn't it? The unfortunate fact of the matter is that the gangsters in charge control one of the largest arsenals in the history of humankind, so it's not a simple matter of telling them to be good lads and run off to federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison.

The best we can hope for, I fear, is that they will be allowed to slink off with about a sizeable chunk of the nation's wealth, savings, and prestige. Perhaps that will be enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I think he will be referred for impeachment now.
As an unindicted co-conspirator.

If Fitzgerald is going at the falsified case for the Iraq war, then the buck stops with Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. From your keyboard . . .
. . . to the ears of God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. Did I not hear that bushcheney discussed this Plame affair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Didn't all the principals, Bush included, pass around the memo? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. The have to go after Bush for the AF! caper. They have to go after
Cheney for stuff happening in his meetings and phone calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. well then. Its official . Cant do one without doing both.
Fitzy is in a pickle. Indicting the entire bush administration would be bold. It would be right , but it would be unprecedented.

Thats never happened before , has it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I don't know that he can indict a sitting President.
But Mosley said above that if you strike at the King, you'd better kill him.

Fitzgerald would be incredibly foolish to come this far and leave Bush in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. No - I think Cheney is more valuable to "them" than Bush
I'm just saying......

Look at who has the real control in this administration, who is really running profiteering from Iraqi & Afghanistan wars, who was first to profiteer from Katrina contracts.... who was behind the FIRST Iraq war? Who is making the real money? It's Cheney. And he's not just making it for himself, he's sharing the love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. That's exactly it.
Which is why if Cheney is leaving, and Libby said that about the Aspens turning, it means Bush is toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm surprised they don't toss the Chimp overboard
He's getting more and more mentally incompetent and it's getting tough to hide. Doesn't matter if it's alcohol, drugs, or what--the man is faltering badly and they need to get rid of him before he wets his pants in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. That gave me a chuckle.
Seriously, he's finished. Anyone can see that just by watching him in front of reporters.

They would do well to get this over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
39. I agee 100%. I have thought the same thing.
If it goes up as far as Cheney, jawtick is in trouble too.
Cheney will take the hit for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I don't think so.
I'm starting to think Cheney thinks he's not worth the trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. LOL He's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
43. No- I think the Chimp-in-a-Bubble has been well insulated from
Edited on Tue Oct-18-05 04:06 PM by npincus
all... he didn't even know about black people locked in the NO Convention Centeruntil 4 days later. (or so he says).

I think the minions keep the king protected. And Cheney's the real president anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
45. It has always been my contention that Rove works for Cheney.
Edited on Tue Oct-18-05 04:29 PM by higher class
With a heirarchy that looks something like this:

. Tri-Lateral Commission and the super wealthy movers and shakers whose names are never in the news for politics.
. Another level of bankers, ceo's, foundation presidents, military brass, and foreigners like M Thatcher and maybe the Queen, plus owners in the media, and judges, and clans such as the Saudi family and rhe Rev Moon.
. Hard core republican leaders who write the objectives and execute the plan and authorize certain people to act it out - from Fed Society AEI Heritage and other similar organization.
. PNAC which makes up a list of people who are in the above, but who have been given permission to try their plan.
. Cheney
. Rove Libby and all the others who strategize.
. Bush, imo, is at the bottom - a figurehead for their faithful followers.

When a reverend becomes angry - he goes up the ladder past Bush.
When the head of a big corporation is worried about something - he goes past Bush.

And not because Bush is busy flying around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC