Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ALEXANDER BUTTERFIELD

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 11:51 PM
Original message
ALEXANDER BUTTERFIELD
Edited on Thu Oct-20-05 12:03 AM by WilliamPitt
Who?

Exactly.

Alexander Butterfield was the White House senior aide under Nixon who let it slip under oath that the Oval was bugged.

Alexander Butterfield was the guy whose testimony brought down the hammer.

White House senior aide.

John Hannah?

Wurmser?

Who?

Exactly.

History, it seems, is just getting started.

(edit for the confused: there are no plamegate tapes...try harder... :) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. An amazing thing isn't it?
Just when they least expect it --- whomp! there it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Will...don't tease...
Are you implying there is TAPE of wrong doings????? This can't get any better...I'm going off to sleep with sweet dreams...thanks!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. No no no, no tapes.
Jeez.

There's a senior White House aide that history has forgotten. That's the point.

If there were tapes, the headline would have been HOLY FUCKING SHIT, THERE ARE TAPES, probably followed by at least a dozen exclamation points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. sorry...I'm just jumpy...
I know this thing is going to bust wide open soon and I didn't know your level of coyness...good to know you wouldn't hold back...

This is still good news...could you write that headline anyway...just for fun????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. can I buy a clue?
there are tapes? If not, even if these guys "turn" its their word against the leader of the free world. And after all, he was able to convince 58M Americans he was a good president in 2004. Won't he just do it again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. No
Jeez.

There's a senior White House aide that history has forgotten. That's the point.

If there were tapes, the headline would have been HOLY FUCKING SHIT, THERE ARE TAPES, probably followed by at least a dozen exclamation points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Jeez. Then its no biggie....to those of us who also remember
Iran/Contra. Or a million other "top aides" who sing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Strange, isn't, how these seemingly small, unexpected details
turn everything around? I followed the whole Watergate thing avidly, from the beginning -- and when this obscure guy, Butterfield, mentioned -- rather casually, as I recall -- that Nixon had a secret taping system, the whole thing went nuclear. And now it's starting to look like deja vu all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cheney and Rumsfeld learned nothing from their sensei.
Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. lol I just got off the phone with my mom...
I was having trouble remembering the names of the two 'flippers' - Hannah and Wurmser.

My mom said, "It doesn't matter - they could bring the whole thing down like that guy in the Nixon WH did... what was his name? Butterball?" LOL We were one the phone for ten more minutes and she was beating her head with the phone trying to remember the name, and I had NO idea who she was talking about!

Thanks! Now I can call my mom and tell her so she stops going nuts over that! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ah yes, Will, Alexander Butterfield.
Don't you think it kind of karmic (?) that today is the 32nd anniversary of the Saturday Night Massacre?

Could history be repeating itself, once again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. John Dean really started things.
Edited on Thu Oct-20-05 12:23 AM by longship
Alexander Butterfield finished it.

Here's a good story about that event:

Butterfield was sitting in a barber's chair in the Capital barber shop when he was due to testify. Every TV had the hearings on and every barber shop had a TV. Butterfield watched on the TV as an aid leaned over Sam Ervin's shoulder--he was telling him that Butterfield, due to testify, was in the barber shop. Ervin's great eyebrows flapped up and down a couple of times as he told the aid that if Butterfield didn't get his butt into the chamber quickly that he'd send the Senate Sargent-at-Arms to fetch him. Butterfield showed up in chambers freshly-coiffed and a bit more contrite a bit later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. As I recall, Butterfield was ASKED a question to which he responded
with the revelation of the tape system. The question prompted this answer, otherwise it would not have come out then. Another moral to the story: pull that thread to start the knot unraveling.

If Wilson had knuckled under when his wife was outed, or if others hadn't taken up the issue when he wrote the NYT article, we would not be waiting for the indictments now.

It makes a difference: ask the questions and insist on answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Hannah and Wurmser were asked questions, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Yes. I think Sam Dash asked Butterfield about something or other....
and Butterfield revealed the tapping system. This was during the private interviews with staffers.

I'll never forget that day Butterfield testified. Think it was on a Friday. There was a rumor that something startling was going to happen in the afternoon session. Butterfield spoke for less than 20 minutes. The TV guys didn't even know who he was. The 1st thing I thought of when the taping system was revealed was that John Dean had better have been very honest about his previous 2 week testimony or he'd be going down for perjury. Turns out John Wesley Dean III, had been remarkably accurate.... almost verbatim.... the tapes later proved.

End of Dick-fer-brains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. yes, that's as I remember it too. Butterfield's revelation was totally out
of the blue and it was the breakthrough that changed everything overnight. Goes to show: you never can be sure what's at the other end of even the most unpromising thread you have the choice of pulling on or letting go.

John Dean has a truly amazing memory. I remember Olbermann writing about it in his blog some months ago; he commented with evident awe on how Dean remembered even baseball statistics and team personnel from decades ago as if he had the record books in front of him. So Dean's scholarly essays on legal precedents come with that extra experience and layers upon layers of memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. lol! Just thought of something. If they put the screws to Harriet Miers
could she be the next John Dean? I bet she isn't totally in the dark about what went on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. she certainly seems to be a likely culprit in getting info to Dan Rather
Edited on Thu Oct-20-05 01:09 PM by cryingshame
she's the one who dealt with scrubbing the TANG info.

WHO funneled that info to the hispanic woman that gave Burkett a military document with legitimate info but questinable provinance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Wouldn't it be great if someone on the judiciary committee confronted her
with this? A woman can dream, can't she???? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. HOLY FUCKING SHIT, THERE ARE TAPES!!!!!!!!!!!!
No, it was Butterfield. I knew is all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. If there are no tapes, are there
disks--as in computer disks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. All the disks in Cheney's office were examined last week
by FBI supposedly investigating a spy from the Phillipines.

What if it was realy Fitz' who was after those things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Did I win?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Just confirms yer mind is and quick and deadly like a steel trap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Whew! I thought I might be losing my edge there for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC