Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Harriet cannot adequately complete routine forms...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BeyondThePale Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 08:50 AM
Original message
If Harriet cannot adequately complete routine forms...
for the senate, how in the hell is she going to serve as a SCOTUS justice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Her clerks will write all the opinions...
...same as Justice Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. The same way Bush serves as president or Quayle as VP. The Repubs
glorify mediocrity and mock accomplishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. There it is
Since they have such a negative opinion of government and those who serve as public servents; there's no reason to put people of accomplishment in those people. Rather why waste a talented person on Government when he or she could be working in the private sector?

Bryant
check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. I also blame this "oversite" on the aides who help prepare her
for the hearings! I thought stuff like form completion would be part of their job too!

It really does look the the whole admin is falling apart! Someone mentioned the gang that couldn't shoot straight. It sure looks likke 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. But she always uses a spell checker!
And she works HARD (or maybe she likes the White House better than her condo).

Isn't that ENOUGH?

Sheeeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm cutting Harriet some slack. Her secretary probably was delegated
this clerical duty and goofed. I've worked in law offices and often seen lawyers who don't do the form things except sign the checks presented. It wouldn't surprise me if the secretary was fired for this innocuous slip-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. not this questionaire. It is serious stuff, lots of questions
and it asks for her opinion on various things. It helps the committee evaluate her.

This was the MOST important task she had before her, and she failed. miserably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Conceded. I was focusing on a single question, not the questionnaire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. but, she still phukked it up. royally. Has she no shame?
No sense of embarrassment? No professionalism?
This is her final exam for her seat on the bench.

As Sen. Coates (r) (her babysitter) called it a work in progress, perhaps that term applies to Miers in general.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. How come she gets a mulligan?
I mean really, this is total bullshit. She tried, she failed, she is not qualified for the job. Next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldlady Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. I read the form on cspan
mostly it was lazy...
she had long lists with "dates not available" before listing things she had been involved in. She could have googled herself and gotten most of this information. just lazy. I say we pass, we've had enough of these vacationing leaders.

Her only cases of interest involved helping a woman who was denied SSI and finding a way for Cheney to run and still receive Texas electoral votes...he's from Wyoming, yeah, right.

However, I do find it interesting that she was on the board for Girls, Inc, the organization the right wing is boycotting American Girl over, because of their "I Can" bracelets, and the sharing of sexual reproduction facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. I personally have more experience than she does
this nomination is a JOKE, and damn it, someone in the Dem party needs to call them on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. This is Pretty Much the Last Straw for Me
Because of Reid's support and her former registration as a Democrat, I was willing to keep an open mind on Meirs. It's obvious now that she's a tool of the right wing and can't think for herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Name me a recent repuke judicial nominee who has
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC