Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald prosecuted Al-Qaida for 1993 World Trade Center bombing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 10:45 AM
Original message
Fitzgerald prosecuted Al-Qaida for 1993 World Trade Center bombing
Fitzgerald is certainly an interesting investigator for this case. A little background:

The full damage caused by the leak isn't yet knowable (at least without the clearance). But Valerie Wilson's CIA front, Brewster-Jennings, was reportedly tasked with tracking the smuggling of explosive materials in the Middle East, so that crap like the 1993 WTC attack, the embassy bombings in Africa, and 9-11 wouldn't be even worse next time.

(That's the operation apparently shit-canned by this White House for their own political gain. So you can see why the CIA lifers pushed the case for criminal investigation, and why people are throwing the word "treason" around so much.)

The 1993 WTC attack was prosecuted by... Patrick Fitzgerald.

Fitzgerald was then assigned to prosecute, yes, the Al-Qaeda bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa.

Fitzgerald was building a case against Osama Bin Laden five years before 9-11.

...
If there's a single prosecutor in America who fully understands what the Plame case is about -- a reckless compromise of national security for political interest -- it's this guy. If there's a prosecutor in this country who groks the background and context of the specific operations destroyed by this crime, it's this guy. And if there's a single prosecutor capable of pursuing a conspiracy case no matter where it reaches, it sure seems like it's this guy.

-- http://oldamericancentury.org/bb/index.php?showtopic=3955&st=0&

via http://stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2005/10/nest-of-rats.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Actually, the WTC '93 case prosecutor was Mary Jo White.
Edited on Thu Oct-20-05 11:15 AM by leveymg
Fitzgerald was a senior lawyer under her in the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. http://archives.cnn.com/2001/LAW/02/16/white.profile/
You're essentially correct. Fitz probably knows more about national security and terrorism prosecutions than anyone in the system today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thank you for this correction
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. So basically he's untouchable
And Repubs screaming "partisan attacks!!!" don't know what they are talking about. As usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Which means that he understands conspiracies
backwards and forwards, inside and out. Between this and his Mafia prosecutions, he has exactly the experience, patience and ability to put the pieces together. If he has the Italian papers (which apparently he does) he has the roadmap for the whole scheme. Untangling this plate of spaghetti to the point of being able to nail the perps is going to take some time, but it will be worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. How come the more I find out about this, the more I feel
things won't be coming down this week or next. I'm thinking more along the lines of Extension.

Anybody else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Didn't they actually have movies of them making the bomb?
How tough of a case could that have been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC