Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prediction: 8-member Supreme Court until 2009

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bustarbusto Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:06 PM
Original message
Prediction: 8-member Supreme Court until 2009
Edited on Thu Oct-20-05 06:10 PM by bustarbusto
Bush, practising his particular specialty as seen in Iraq and fiscal policy, has painted himself into a corner once again with the Harriet Miers nomination. The stealth candidate who was meant to slip under the radar of the left, Roberts-style, while being blindly accepted by the cynically sanctimonious right, will not be accepted by either side. Her confirmation is a guaranteed dud. Worse for Bush Inc. is that following her failure all sensors will be active on both sides. The wacko contingent of the radical conservatives won't accept anyone who is not a vocally unequivocal anti-abortion advocate with a solid paper trail to prove it, the liberals won't accept anyone who is.

If Bush pushes through a transparently anti-Roe candidate, the Republican party will lose their moderate base and be doomed for decades. And if Bush were foolish enough to submit another nominee who is hazy on that issue, he'll be crucified by the neocons.

Any nomination Bush submits after withdrawing Miers' name (and there's no way she'll make it past the confirmation hearings) is suicide. Get ready for a four-four court for the next three years.

Just a prediction.

Plug: http://www.avantnews.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=146">Here's an optimistic prior-to-the-fact transcript of the not-going-to-happen Miers hearings. Optimistic in the sense that I strongly doubt there will be a hearing for Miers. Still, it's 17,000 words worth, and it's rather droll. If you had the stomach to read the entire transcript of the Roberts hearings, you might find much of it eerily familiar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a possibility. You know, Bush can make a recess appointment
to SCOTUS. It's happened before, and he was rejected when the appointment expired. Not that I know any details, I just saw it on a list of SCOTUS justices once.

Here's something: What if Bush packs the Supreme Court? We can campaign in 2008 on the partisan Court, win the presidency and Senate, and raise the number of justices to 11. Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I like the sound of this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. O'Connor has said that she'll stay on the court until..
her successor has been confirmed...so we'll still have 9 total judges, barring any unfortunate passings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bustarbusto Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's a good point.
I'd forgotten that her retirement is conditional on a replacement having been confirmed.

I hereby revise my prediction to a 9-member court with O'Connor continuing as associate justice until the next democratically elected president, i.e., a democrat, can name her successor in 2009, barring, as you say, ill health or passing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC