ohio_liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 08:07 AM
Original message |
Poll question: OH-Sen: Who will you support for Ohio Senator? |
|
This is just an informal poll for Ohioans and non-Buckeyes alike. Who do you support in the primary for OH Senator?
|
MaineDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 08:10 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I wonder if the results will differ from the last poll here (nt) |
ohio_liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Hackett, but should Brown be the nominee, I'll gladly support him, too. |
|
I'm just pissed that he decided to run after he assured Hackett that he wouldn't.
|
ohio_liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I hate to say this but I think Rep. Brown is overestimating his netroots support at the present time.
|
ohio_liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 08:58 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I found a Mother Jones audio file on Hackett |
|
http://www.airamericaplace.com/upload/aamj101605.mp3It comes after the story on Boeing whistleblowers. That story will blow your mind, so take a while and listen if you have a chance.
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
but I will contribute some currency to help Hackett. :)
|
rndmprsn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
7. hackett in the primary for sure...and whoever wins that in the general... |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 01:36 PM by rndmprsn
election...either way dewine is done for...i'd rather it be hackett, but brown isn't so bad either, coming from a former resident of akron OH, he doesn't have the sexiness that hackett does, but is a great dem for sure.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 01:04 AM
Response to Original message |