Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald Apparently Ready to Indict Rove, Libby, Hadley

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:45 AM
Original message
Fitzgerald Apparently Ready to Indict Rove, Libby, Hadley
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 10:07 AM by JABBS
As he concludes his investigation into the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame, Special Prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald is focusing on whether senior White House advisor Karl Rove, and Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, sought to conceal their actions and mislead prosecutors, lawyers involved in the case told the New York Times.

Among the charges that Fitzgerald is considering are perjury, obstruction of justice and false statement -- counts that suggest the prosecutor may believe the evidence presented in a 22-month grand jury inquiry shows that the two White House aides sought to cover up their actions, the lawyers said. There may be others in the government who could be charged for violations of the disclosure law or of other statutes, like the espionage act, which makes it a crime to transmit classified information to people not authorized to receive it.

Rove and Libby have been advised that they may be in serious legal jeopardy, the lawyers said. Some lawyers in the case said they were persuaded that Fitzgerald had all but made up his mind to seek indictments.

A perjury charge against Rove stems from him initially not telling the grand jury he talked to <em>Time</em> magazine reporter Matt Cooper about Plame. Rove only recalled the conversation after the discovery of an e-mail message he sent to Stephen Hadley, then the deputy national security adviser.

Larry Johnson, a former CIA agent who trained with Plame and has aggressively criticized the Bush Administration via his blog, posted earlier this week that Hadley also is facing indictment.

"Hadley has told friends he expects to be indicted," Johnson wrote.

***

The possible violations under consideration are peripheral to the issue Fitzgerald was appointed in December 2003 to investigate: whether anyone in the administration broke a federal law that makes it a crime, under certain circumstances, to reveal the identity of a covert intelligence officer.

It is still not publicly known who first told the columnist Robert D. Novak the identity of the CIA officer, Valerie Wilson. Novak identified her in a column on July 14, 2003, using her unmarried name, Valerie Plame.

While Fitzgerald could still charge administration officials with knowingly revealing Plame's identity, several lawyers in the case said he was more likely to seek charges for easier-to-prove crimes such as making false statements, obstruction of justice and disclosing classified information. He may also bring a broad conspiracy charge, lawyers told Reuters.

***

Still, the Washington Post reports that the White House is already quietly confronting the looming prospect of a Bush presidency without Rove, his long-time senior advisor.

Initially, the administration plans to undertake a spin campaign. Senior GOP officials are developing a public relations strategy to defend those accused of crimes and, more importantly, shield Bush from further damage, Republicans familiar with the plans told the Post.

Additionally, the White House is already considering how it would fill the gap that would be created if Rove were to resign, although a Republican with close ties to the White House told the Post, "Anyone who talks about that kind of stuff should be shot."

Names apparently already under consideration are budget director Joshua B. Bolten, former Republican National Committe chairman Ed Gillespie or current party chairman Ken Mehlman.

***

This item first appeared at Journalists Against Bush's B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Security Clerances


I Hope they are REVOKED on the spot for both of these hateful people........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Suddenly I get the feeling
that we may hear something today. Come on Fitzy - next week Wilma will be the star and anticipation is killing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Me too
Maybe I'm imagining it, but I thought I heard (yesterday) that Fitz was having a press conference today. Never heard any more details, so maybe I mis-understood. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. timing of indictments
I think it's more likely to be the end of next week. It's almost a certainty that the Washington Post would report the night before (on-line) the indictments were to be handed down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Only if there was an embargoed press release.
I don't get the impression the Fitzgerald plays footsie with the print press to that degree. That's a game played by press offices to create the perception that they support a "level playing field" between broadcast and print media. I think the DOJ press office is as clueless about timing as everyone else. Fitz would be inclined, I believe, to announce on a Friday afternoon if only to relieve staff from the barrage of phone calls during regular office hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. In his own time
I think that Fitzgerald will run this thing completely on his own terms. If he's ready, no matter what day, he'll call the PC. What a tremendous difference from the moron Starr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. agreed - Fitz is not a showboat, not concerned w press schedules
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. I knew it, I knew it, I knew it!
"Initially, the administration plans to undertake a spin campaign. Senior GOP officials are developing a <strong>public relations strategy to defend those accused of crimes and, more importantly, shield Bush from further damage, Republicans familiar with the plans told the Post."

Deny and slime...rinse, repeat
Deny and slime...rinse, repeat
Deny and slime...rinse, repeat
Deny and slime...rinse, repeat


:argh: :argh: :argh:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. DeLay Defense
"The Liberals are doing it! Those Democrat operatives are behind this!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. You know, they really should read *'s favorite political philosopher
Ye shall know the truth and it shall make ye free.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. The National Security Advisor of the United States
is about to be indicted as part of a conspiracy to reveal the name of a CIA agent.

Consider that. For a moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Considered. I hope to God there is an indictment with her name on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Actually, it's a 'him'.
Stephen Hadley, that is, who took Kinda Sleazy's spot when she moved to State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. A valid consideration but,
my concern is that even with irrefutable evidence the American people still won't get it. After all, how many people still believe there were WMD's in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. National Security. National Security betrayed. National Security,...
,...sacrificed. National Security endangered. National INSECURITY created.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Take the traitors down, Fitz.
My man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. Anyone who talks about that kind of stuff should be shot."
I can't believe these people. Can you imagine the freep outrage if a Dem said this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. If he's going to, I wish he'd go the whole hog AND indict
The fucking bastard triplets of Dick Cheney, John Bolton and Condi Rice.

I hate the fucking fuckers. Pig traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Another terra alert
indictments could be coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yeah, it's TERRA TERRA TERRA...is Paula Kahn on ALREADY?
Is she drooling YET?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC