Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge B.B. Schraub gets to decide if Delay gets to choose

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:09 AM
Original message
Judge B.B. Schraub gets to decide if Delay gets to choose
his Judge..He is the Supervising Judge that this one deferred to today.

What causes has HE given to this past year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would LOVE to know. This could be a vicious circle..
Only Judges who live under rocks would be safe from this scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coffeenap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's a little--from hospital board info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. good starting points:
Mr. Schraub received his LLB degree from St. Mary's University School of Law and his licensure as an attorney in 1954. Mr. Schraub has had a long and distinguished career in public life. He served as judge in the 25th Judicial District for twenty years and as judge in the 3rd Administrative Judicial Region since 1990. He is the recipient of the 1992 Outstanding Jurist Award presented by the Texas Bar Foundation. He served on the Board of Directors of the National Judicial College from 1992 through 1998, and in 1998, was chosen Chair-Emeritus of the Board of Trustees of that institution. He is a member of the Guadalupe County Bar Association, the State Bar of Texas, the American Bar Association, and is Past President of the South Central Texas Bar Association. He has served and continues to serve on a number of civic organizations and associations dealing with legal and judicial professions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coffeenap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. link to open secrets info from 2000 back:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. At opensecrets.com
It shows he contributed
$250 on 10/7/2002 to John Cronyn
$500 on 7/29/2000 to George W Bush
$1000 on 5/31/2000 to George W Bush
$500 on 6/30/1999 to George W Bush
$250 on 11/30/1989 to Phil Gramm

http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?NumOfThou=0&txtName=Schraub&txtState=TX&txtZip=&txtEmploy=&txtCand=&txt1992=Y&txt1990=Y&Order=N
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. vewy intawesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not_Giving_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. OK, so does the DA get to ask the supervising judge to recuse HIMSELF?
Seems only fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. That's exactly what should happen, but won't. EXCEPT,
remember the FL. repub "activist fundamentalist judge" who ruled in the Schiavo case? He ruled against the wackos. Maybe the Texas machine will take this bastard down. We can hope. I don't care WHO they appoint to this case, he/she will have donated to SOMEONE in politics...Dem or repuke...maybe Nader? Perot? :shrug: This could go on forever. I thought Tommy boy wanted this over by Thanksgiving?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well, there you go. The fix is in unless this is
a "real" judge. I hope they do not change venues. Texas is Texas and it could be held in any county. No wonder Tom has been smiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm not sure:
Note that there are no donations listed in th '04 election cycle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks for pointing that out. Maybe he stopped drinking
the Kool-Ade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. A Republican area would not guarantee a Republican jury.
Same for a Democratic area. You get a mix no matter where you go. A rural or suburban county might be more conservative. There again, with the mood in the nation, you can't tell. As for the judge, it doesn't look good. But, in California, at least, certain judges have bad reputations. Lawyers who get them tend to request a different judge, so the judges with the bad reputations have fewer cases and are available to take the cases that are transferred out of other courts. That means that the lawyer who requests a different judge is likely to get a worse than. Cases just get moved from one unpopular judge to another. It's pretty pointless to request a new judge. Many judges are pro-prosecutor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. To add: these are only the listed contributions
as I know that all contributions I have made are not on opensecrets but that is probably just because they are smaller in nature.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. DeLay's Strategy Is Working - Anytime The Media Reports On...
his indictments they say something to the effect that Ronnie Earle is a Democrat, or its politically motivated, etc. So DeLay gets his message repeated multiple times so the Sheeple start believing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. these judges are all partisan - would be best if they could find an
Independant judge but I doubt we will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't think that is DUers point in researching this and pointing this ou
the point is Delay doesn't want an "Independent" judge. Judges have every right to be partisan but in their occupation they are to rule with objectivity.

Delay is claiming that the current judge cannot because he gave money to a democratic organization. I like that the judge said that he would pass it on to his superior because if his superior rules in favor of Delay his superior knows that his ruling would also be questioned because of his past contributions.

I love it.

When you're six feet deep in crap, you can dress it up all you want but it is still 6 feet of crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. But who will care?
He can't lose by taking a partisan Republican stance because Texas is solidly Republican (at the moment).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Oh but I think he can lose
America is at or beyond it's tipping point. Even apolitical people see through this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thorandmjolnir Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well Mr. B.B. Schraub looks like a fine man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Hi Bjarne Riis!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. The Judge Should Have RULED and Let the Chips/Appeal Fall Wherever
instead of going on the defensive and looking like a wimp. Maybe he needs O'LOOFAH's book for kids on standing up to bullies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC