Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Miers Give Bush's TANG Documents To Rove? Was Her Law Firm Paid Off?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 11:45 AM
Original message
Did Miers Give Bush's TANG Documents To Rove? Was Her Law Firm Paid Off?
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 11:50 AM by cryingshame
Miers' law firm got 2 huge payments of 70,000 (140,000) while working for Bush Campaign against an opponent trailing 25+ points and who personally only spent about 20,000 on his legal representation.

All that money wasn't for legal representation. Was it money for bribery, hush money and other nefarious activities involved in covering up Bush's past?

We know Miers was in charge of Bush's TANG records which got scrubbed.

We know that someone funneled one of the TANG documents to Burkett who then gave it to Dan Rather.

We know that document had accuruate information confirmed by the secretary who worked for Bush's TANG commander. But same secretary disavowed that particular document- it is of questionable provenance and most likely not an original but a rewritten form passed on to Burkett from a Rove operative.

Now HOW did that original TANG document get to Burkett? Miers was the one in charge of scrubbing those TANG documents... did SHE provide it to the Rove smear and disinformation machine?

Is THAT a part of why she's being put up for SCOTUS? A reward for services rendered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. All according to the way the BFEE's usual MO works.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. A story major media will not look into - but interesting
:toast:

:-)

By the way "But same secretary disavowed that particular document- it is of questionable provenance and most likely not an original but a rewritten form passed on to Burkett from a Rove operative." could be phrased such as to focus on the fact that the technolgy was at the base for typying that Doc as presented on 60 minutes - "most likely a rewritten" comes all the "put a Word Doc over it" BS that was later proven to be BS (the Illinois lab study)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, the Secretary Said SHE Did not Type It
She did not, and could not, substantiate that it was a forgery. And it was certainly not written on a modern PC, but on a contemporary typewriter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Perhaps the original the secretary DID type was held by someone
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 12:26 PM by havocmom
who wanted an assured future while a duplicate was typed to be used as a bargining chip? Rove would be the guy to let know one had such an original... And Rove would be the guy to use it against anyone (named Dan) who might want to expose the truth about AWOL's service record.

Just, ya know, thinking out loud...

edited for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. IIRC, she said that she'd typed a docmument just like that one but not
the exact one presented to her in the interview.

There were small errors in the one Rather had. For example, it contained a term assoc. with Marines not Air Force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Democrats are asking about this... could get interesting.
Edited on Sat Oct-22-05 09:32 PM by cryingshame
Harriet Miers Asked About Role in Bush's '98 Campaign
By Charles Babington and Amy Goldstein
Washington Post Staff Writers

Senators are asking Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers to provide more information about her role as a lawyer for President Bush's 1998 Texas gubernatorial campaign, for which her firm was paid $140,000.

In answering a Judiciary Committee questionnaire this week, Miers mentioned her legal roles in Bush's first gubernatorial campaign, in 1994, and in his 2000 campaign for president. But she did not mention the 1998 gubernatorial reelection campaign, for which her firm was paid far more than the $7,000 it received in 1994, according to a review of campaign records by the Associated Press.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't have the
Edited on Sat Oct-22-05 09:42 PM by raysr
the link but Mier's sold some property for $100,000 that wasn't worth that to Texas, I think, and that's being looked into. Here's the link,
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1154AP_Miers_Land_Sale.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC