Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BRAD BLOG BREAKING: NON-PARTISAN GAO REPORT CONFIRMS E-VOTING CONCERNS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:26 PM
Original message
BRAD BLOG BREAKING: NON-PARTISAN GAO REPORT CONFIRMS E-VOTING CONCERNS!
BREAKING: NON-PARTISAN GAO REPORT RAISES, CONFIRMS SERIOUS QUESTIONS ABOUT SECURITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES!
Report Accompanied by BI-PARTISAN Press Release Issued by U.S. House Members!

Congressmen: 'A Wake Up Call', 'Foundation of Democracy Rests Upon Security, Integrity of our Voting System"

"oncerns about electronic voting machines have been realized and have caused problems with recent elections, resulting in the loss and miscount of votes."

That's just one of chilling revelations from the non-partisan Government Accountability Office's (GAO) 107-page report on the security of Election Voting Machines in America as just released moments ago. The report confirms many of the greatest concerns expressed by those who have called for Election Reform since the deeply flawed 2004 Presidential Election.

The GAO report (download complete report here ) was created in response to a request by several members of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee.

A joint bi-partisan press release (3 Republicans, 3 Democrats) touting the findings of the report has just been issued by the U.S. House of Representatives...

FULL STORY, COMPLETE GAO REPORT, CONGRESSIONAL PRESS RELEASE:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001940.htm

---
Brad Friedman
THE BRAD BLOG - The uprising continues...
http://www.BradBlog.com
VELVET REVOLUTION - The revolution begins...
http://www.VelvetRevolution.us

*** The BRAD SHOW On the Air via RAW RADIO!
*** http://www.BradShow.com
*** Broadcast coast-to-coast and around the globe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Finally! Maybe now we can start to safeguard our votes.
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 12:30 PM by stop the bleeding
Its a start but we still have a long way to go.

Also nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow! I hope that actual election reform will occur.
Thanks for posting this great news.

Paper ballots now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If nothing else it's good timing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. It will not be in the Sunday Papers or talk shows - the MSM censorship
will kill this story so fast ......

Even a GAO report does not exist if published on page A19 on a Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Noticed BradBlog beat MSNBC AND CNN with this which one
will be first out of those 2?

MSNBC OR CNN?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am so excited!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Concerns does NOT mean they'll do a damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. We've got until elections next year to do something.
At least the problem is being acknowledged now, albeit five years too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Could we please cut down on the all caps thread titles?

IT'S SO FUCKING ANNOYING FOR NEAR-TRIVIAL NEWS.

THANK YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Near trivial news???
:rofl:

Who is counting YOUR votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I agree with your subject line, but the near-trivial thing is unbelievable
E-voting may be the reason why we got Bush for four more years. Nothing trivial about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. e-voting sucks

no doubt about that. But it's a superficial problem largely created by an attitude of disrespect for and disinterest in the average citizen. A puritanism about voting process is itself a superficial matter, does nothing about that central problem.

I've looked at it long and hard myself. The structural root of the present corruption and abusable complexity in American elections is, in my assessment, the set of ex-felon/probationer/parolee disenfranchisement laws. I see zero interest in dealing with that in all these threads. It's hard political work and it's not about enhancing the power and importance of nice middle class people. Whereas geeking out about the minutiae of poorly designed hardware and software, loudly protesting a company that aggressively sells this crap to slothful and callous county boards, and running statistical analyses based in wrong ideas of conditional probability- that is proposed to be Progess and Integrity.

As for the evidence that e-voting handed Bush one or both elections, I sympathize with the desires involved but it's not demonstrable, nor does it have real point. The voter views in the months before and months after both elections are clear and there is no mandate for either Democrat in evidence.

In fact, much as I abhor the suffering and death and impoverishment and psychological reality it caused, I am sadly sure that the Right running the country and proving their incompetence, obsolescence, and stupidity in practice was the only way of getting most of the crap in the Cold War-defined political system and in American voters' heads exposed to and hammered/eroded away by post-Cold War reality. This country was running insane in 2000- I think never in the country's history was it so materially well off and yet as psychologically imbalanced, short of the runup to the Civil War. All of the pent up unresolved idiocy of two generations wanted out out out. Go look at what Bush campaign rallies in 2000 were like in the newspaper reports- conventions and carnivals for unabashedly happy and utterly arrogant lunatics. The man ran at 60% support for most of the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks Brad! recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Another good step forward. Don't forget: this story was supposed to
be dead in the water the day after * "won" the popular vote.

A bipartisan finding from the GAO for the House Judiciary Committee is not trivial. It's not the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, but it's another advance.

Thanks, Brad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. How about a case of false advertising?
· In Pennsylvania, a county made a ballot error on an electronic voting system that resulted in the county's undervote percentage reaching 80% in some precincts.
· In North Carolina, electronic voting machines continued to accept votes after their memories were full, causing over 4,000 votes to be lost.

Now that cannot be under the error rate they claimed!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Brad, I don't know how many times now the GAO has confirmed our
beliefs of problems ie Halliburton, the Fed's blame for Katrina inaction, etc..and they can't do a darn thing. The Congress is Republican ruled as is the Atty Generals office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thank you Brad
for your continuing fight for Every Vote To COUNT!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. We're on a roll! Thank you, Brad!
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. thanks, Brad -
you are tireless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm going to take this as good news.
It happier than I've been in months on this subject.

I've sent out letters on the subject and I know other people have.

We are being listened to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. Until REAL reform takes place, we must boycott all e-voting machines
And we have to take this seriously. Here in Dallas, all early voting is done on ESS e-voting machines. That means we may have to boycott early voting until we get some machines that we deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. Whoops, Diebold headed back down....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. Now here's one of them thar' crystal clear examples of
"why the hell don't the Dems--the whole goddamn lot of them on the Hill--swarm the reporters/cameras waving this report and screaming??". Really--why not?? I mean this basically then confirms that one need not go out and vote because this isn't a democracy anyhow and confirms that these pigs are illegally in offce, etc. and we have a couple reps "concerned" and that's all!! Bottom line: there's nothing stopping the Dems on the Hill of MAKING THIS A #1 story to go along with all the others coming down the pike. Put the goddamn stake in their hearts while we have them down on the floor. I just give up........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Are you one of them?
'Them' being the type that I read all the complaints about? That "We should just give up"?

I've been reading people complaining that some here have been saying that, and that it is a demoralizing statement. I would agree with them, "We should all give up" posts are worthless. But I don't think you are suggesting that we give up, it's just that some could take it that way. Know what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
25. okay, could our elected Dem leaders start screaming about this
NOW? I don't care if the corporate whores don't want to hear it. They can interject it into live interviews. Start thinking outside the box. This is the most important issue we've got going right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. So...this seems like "old & dead news" but it's STILL IMPORTANT!
After Fitzgerald we go back and dig deeper. Maybe a voice for our Eleciton Reform Efforts suddenly takes the forefront...because..this Oldie DU'er has always believed "someone, somewhere in Florida" is ONE DAY going to come forward and SHOW HOW "Election 2000 was STOLEN!"

AND...when that happens we can finally go and IMPEACH SCALIA AND THOMAS for their PUT UP CRAP VOTES that allowed THE HELL WE'VE LIVED WITH UNDER "Failed Bush II" all these years.

In my gut...I know there's a "Whistle Blower" in Florida. I know that it's going to come out how they gave Bush II the ELECTION ...while they hid in a van, truck, someone's home...or a warehouse ...the REAL TALLY OF FLORIDA 2000 VOTES.

It WILL COME OUT....I know folks think I'm crazy for saying this ...but SOMEONE KNOWS ABOUT "Selection 2000" THEY KNOW...and they will be heard.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC