Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

THEORY: The Intelligent Designer is so complex that there is no way

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:13 PM
Original message
THEORY: The Intelligent Designer is so complex that there is no way
that the Intelligent Designer could have sprung into being on his/her/its own, thus the Theory of an Intelligent Designer Designer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. That theory is far too complex to have come up on its own...
There must be a Designer of Intelligent Designer Designer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Then where did the Designer of Intelligent Designer Designer come from?
The Intelligent Designer Designer Designer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. There had to be a Deisgner of the Intelligent Designer Designer Designer
See below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I think we need the FSM to figure this out for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. A Designer of the Intelligent Designer Designer could never have
"evolved", thus there must have been a Designer of the Designer for the Intelligent Designer Designer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Exactly, and so on, and so on, etc. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I'll see your theory, and raise you a designer
that designed your theory of a designer of the intelligent designer designer. Theoretically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. I think that was done by 'Intelligent Designer Designer Pro II'
...Gold Edition.

It comes with templates and a library of genetic clip art.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. The realization that the theory is too complex to have risen on...
its own itself is too complex to have came from a pool of slime by chance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. I like to refer to it as the 'Super-Smart Alien' theory
because if it wasn't God that created life on earth, and there is no evolution, then it must've been a super-smart alien, right?!

I like your hypothesis though - is it testable?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's turtles, all the way down
Honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. No. No. NO! You've got it all wrong.
The intelligent designer was brought into being by the Flying Spaghetti Monster. This is the meta-pastafarian conjecture. See source documents, Google "meta-pastafarian".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. "The Meta-Pastafarian Conjecture" - BWAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. They were ALL begat by the Noodly Appendage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Alanis Morrissette, with Alan Rickman as an assistant, will reveal all
when the time is right, my children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. If humans were created by an "intelligent designer,"...
...instead of evolution, then why do men have nipples?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UncleSepp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Because without them, where would men put nipple rings?
Duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I was thinking in the appendix.
I guess it wouldn't be very visible there, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UncleSepp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Internal organ piercings - the next hot trend!
Only you and your radiologist know for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Most designers are gay, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Maybe it's an Intelligent Interior Designer. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. LOL... there you go messing up the church's dogma... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. G.O.D. == G.O.D. Of Djinni
Don't forget this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. But if you say the expansion twice as quickly
you can fit the infinite expansion into a finite space. :-)

Does this mean the Intelligent Designer must be smaller and simpler than its creation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Which was produced by the Intelligent Designer Designer Design Committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Howsabout a "Dumb Luck Designer" or an "Accidental Designer"? -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. The intelligent designer is so complex that there is no way
for the theory of the intelligent designer to be proved: all it can really prove is the inadequacy of the intelligence of the theorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. The key word here is "Intelligent", how then do you explain
Right Wing Republicans? Would not an Intelligent Designer (plus or minus a "Designer") have been smart enough to know that they were an evolutionary dead-end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. It boggles the mind
(mine anyhow :))to think of how all this might have come about. But I find it even more boggling to think how it could have happened by 'accident'. I beleive in evolution, but did that start by chance too?
The more experience I have on this planet, the more I find myself agreeing with Iris Dement and the song "I'll just let the mystery be"
But whether intellegent design or evolution we still got stuck with pResident Shit for Brains, front man for the most corrupt, thieivng group of white collar criminals ever assembled at one time in one place........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Since space and time are curved...
The infinite eventually curves back on itself.

Thus, the Intelligent Designer was designed by the Intelligent Designer.

Now that's messed up logic ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. "It's just designers, designers, designers, all the way down..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. ROFL!
:rofl:

That is a great line! Will have to remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. Anthropomorphism fallacy
Naturally, barring any sharing of notes with alien intelligence, there is a circular bias that tends to color all our science, much less our religion. But anyone believing in a transcendent God above the Universe so much it can sustained and brought into being from nothing is pouring an ocean into a seashell to use the suspiciously human model of "intelligence"(single super brain, single volition, one individual) and get simplistic and limited about the concept.

But their theory is embarrassing to any deity worth its salt or any super alien and assigns a sort of inane stupidity worthy perhaps of SOME human brains but totally incapable of even bringing out the single Universe we see at the moment.

Life and universal dynamics have mysteriously seeming lot in common and a trajectory that is not brutally materialistic but all attempts to box the Big Truths so far are rather immature or airily meaningless. This is sad considering they ignore the ONE anthropomorphic point of view that Christianity contributes- on faith alone- that is the incarnation of the deity. Oh no, forget that. Let's get back to the old man with a beard stomping around Eden worrying about the fruit trees and man's reliability. Childish and oddly forgetful of the soul entity that faith allows to escape the anthropomorphic fallacy. Why? Because Jesus wouldn't presume or be bothered with cosmic grandstanding and certainly wouldn't waste a second championing this curriculum oddity as anything important- or sane.

These naive/dishonest people are best put down by theologians, but as in any other profession no one likes to attack their own at the cost of drawing fire upon themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pisle Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'd like to teach Intelligent Design
I already have my lesson plan:

:Goodmorning boys and girls. The theory of Intelligent Design states that a being far superior to us created the universe. Any questions? No? Okay. Study your notes tonight; there will be a test tomorrow."

And that's it. See, what's the big deal? It would only take less than a minute to teach it in any science class. What's the harm in that? O8) :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC