Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: Bush Paid Miers' Firm $163,00 in Legal fees (TX)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:47 PM
Original message
Breaking: Bush Paid Miers' Firm $163,00 in Legal fees (TX)

Reuters
Miers Firm Received Bush Campaign Payments
AP - Fri Oct 21, 3:41 AM ET

WASHINGTON - George W. Bush's rising political fortunes provided a windfall for Harriet Miers' law firm. Campaign records show Bush's Texas gubernatorial campaigns paid Miers a total of $163,000 in legal fees, most of it for work done during the future president's 1998 re-election bid. Some senators are planning to explore Miers' legal work for Bush during her confirmation process to be the newest Supreme Court justice, but the White House says it won't release any memos detailing that work.

http://news.yahoo.com/fc/us/supreme_court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. (Gomer voice): Surprise, surprise, surprise! - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. heard it was work to purge guard files. maybe just a rumor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. But a Dem judge isn't allowed to donate
to anyone.

Nice double standard, repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. We need to be screaming from the rooftops that DeLay is seeking
a partisan judge. Somebody on the Thug payroll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's not a lot of $$ when you employ attorneys.
I don't mean it shouldn't be publicized, but the amount is not significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. 163 grand is a lot of money where I come from -
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlacknBlue in Red NC Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Me too, Bob...isn't that about what it 'd cost to gas up Cheney's Jag?
But, oh, right he wouldn't know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Neither of you apparently have ever hired a corporate lawyer!
20 years ago, we were paying $350/hr.

That's per attorney!

In a different Company, 5 years ago, we were paying $600/hr, and everything done by the firm is added to that. You pay for every copy, every phone call, every letter, postage, fedex charges, mileage charges when someone has to go somewhere on your behalf.

It's a lot of money to me too! But in the world of Corp law, it's rather insignificant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. But the article says that it was the "campaign" that paid the
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 02:08 PM by Dhalgren
money, not Bush. Does that make a difference?

(edit to add) aren't all campaign payments supposed to be public? How can Bush say that this info will not be released?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes they must be reported. I don't know to what level.
I don't know if it's sufficient to simply report $XXXX in legal expenses. I don't think you HAVE to detail who your expenses were paid to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. FYI - that's $188879 in 2005 dollars (adjusted for inflation)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. To hide/alter his TANG records, perhaps? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC