texpatriot2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 05:40 PM
Original message |
Just saw Ronnie Earle on NBC Nightly news...didn't hear it |
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It's too early here in CA. Maybe I'll try to catch it when I get home.
|
kurth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
2. What Ronnie Earle said today |
|
What Ronnie Earle said:
"What this means is: If a judge had contributed to Crime Stoppers, that judge could not hear a burglary case? Carried to its extreme, that is what I think this motion means, and I think that’s absurd. We don’t live in a country where political party determines the measure of justice."
----------------------------------------------------------------
It's awfully hard to find a judge who hasn’t contributed to a political party or partisan organization.
Maybe only female judges can hear crimes committed by women? How about black judges for black defendants?
|
goclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. He said that? That is awesome! |
|
What cracks me up is how can they have the nerve to question a judge when the SC stole the election for them.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Perhaps Delay and his attorney should have a talk with Dino Rossi |
|
As many of you no doubt know, we had a very close and contentious gubernatorial race here in Washington. Democrat Christine Gregoire won out over Republican Dino Rossi. Rossi's people took it to court (their right), and shopped for a judge they thought would be sympathetic to them -- a republican in a republican area of central Washington. They lost. The judge made his decision on the merits (or lack thereof) of the case, not on the political affiliation.
I now Delay wants the current judge to recuse himself because he gave to MoveOn. He obviously wants a judge that he would perceive as being favorable to him because of political affiliation. If a judge cannot be non-partisan and follow the rule of the law, regardless of their own political persuasion, they have no business sitting on the bench.
|
Ksec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Judges in Texas are all elected |
|
You cant find one who doesnt belong to a party. If he aint a Dem then hes probably a rethug.
|
Metta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Obviously grasping at straws. No action is to lame. |
|
If they think it has *any* chance of working or is something they can attempt to throw back at someone later.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message |