Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plame plans to sue White House officials - UPI

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jocapo Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:16 PM
Original message
Plame plans to sue White House officials - UPI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sepia_steel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. As well she should!!
Yes! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. That will force the release of more information I bet. Good move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. they will either claim executive privledge or security concerns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Not sure that will work for much of it. Seems like we have a lot of info
out there already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. How so "executive privilege"? The GOP screwed themselves on that
when they got the Supreme Court to rule that a sitting President was not immune to civil lawsuits when they went after Clinton re: Paula Jones. Ergo, if even the President is subject to civil lawsuits while in office, how can staff members not also be subject to civil lawsuits?

While I know that the hypocricy of the neocons knows no bounds, surely this would be more flightless than an ostrich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. then how come it worked when they tried to get information about
the energy meetings cheney had prior to the iraq war?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ha! Nice shot. Advantage Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. ROFL
:woohoo:

:yourock: Valerie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. discovery is going to be awesome. i wonder if cheney will hold
bush's hand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good for her- well done Valerie! Smart and very important move.
A round of applause for her is definitely in order!
Let's hope she gets a nice group of CIA folks to support her case and be witness for what was done to her by those neocons. (those not in covert positions of course). This is a very good thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seattlemetal Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. I hope this wont enable an 'O.J.' type ending...
you know...where Bush promises to get the real leakers after rove and libby are aquitted? then they get sued in civil court and lose there...

then retire fat and happy on an equisite golf course....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. "After Rove and Libby are aquitted?" If indicted I don't see that ending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Paula Jones chicken comes home to roost
on Republican heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Roost?
don't you mean 'shit'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. much more accurate verb
yes, that's exactly it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Or Chicken hawk?
But yes, it does feel satisfying in an apocalypic kind of way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. White House under siege by real americans
Hallejuah. The republic might be saved after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent, it's about time the Monkey is placed under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. She should ask Judicial Watch for help
Seriously. They have filed some suits against the Bush Administration. It might be worth a try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Nope. This should be a bona fide law suit - not a circus to promote
a delusional hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Good. At the very least this will cost the defendants
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 08:04 PM by Demobrat
a few arms and legs in legal fees. Then they can sit in jail on the criminal charges and wonder how in hell they are going to pay their bills - just like real Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ah, such beautiful irony from the Reverend Moon.
Gather round the Wikipedia fire, children, and learn the story of Paula Jones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones

Now, I don't want to tell the story to you when you can brush up on it yourselves, but I'll drop a few names. Scaife. Hannity. Coulter's in there. And of course... the Clenis.

But wait, you say! There's less irony in that story than in an Alanis Morissette song.

One very important thing to know is that back in the dark ages of the 1990s it was not even a http://www.courttv.com/archive/legaldocs/government/jones/">legally settled matter that the Presdient could be sued. Prior to Paula, it was widely thought that since a President was assumed to be immune from criminal indictment, a President should also be immune to civil suits.

But with the ace legal help of Ann Coulter and Ted Olson (and probably the entire right-wing legal community), and careful shepherding of the case through the right-wing press including the Reverend Moon's Washington Times (he also owns UPI now, publisher of this subject article), Paula managed to get Clinton v. Jones case all the way up to the Supreme Court. They decided that, while the White House is deserving of great respect, the President can in fact be sued, much to the merriment of every single one of those election-stealing bullshit war-starting money laundering pond scum sons-of-bitches.

Now do you feel that irony? Oh yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hell, let's ALL sue him!!!
After all, we have multiple grounds for a HUGE class action suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Why haven't the 9/11 families done this?
Or maybe they have.

Sue the bastards into outter space. Republican monkeys in space!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. They HAVE. There are TWO lawsuits out there.
Edited on Fri Oct-21-05 10:29 PM by Carolab
See Mariani v. Bush and Rodriguez v. Bush.

They are RICO suits.

http://www.911forthetruth.com/

Also, see Stanley Hilton's suit:

TAXPAYERS OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DICK CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT; GEORGE TENET, CIA DIRECTOR; ROBERT MUELLER, FBI DIRECTOR; CONDOLEEZA RICE, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

http://www.911review.org/Wiki/StanleyHiltonComplaint.shtml

Hilton's suit got thrown out on the grounds of "Sovereign Immunity"--because he sued the government.

You need to sue individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. Excellent and it creates some more pain and torture for the bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC