Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miers' Answer Raises Questions ( Proof; She's a dumbass)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 10:56 AM
Original message
Miers' Answer Raises Questions ( Proof; She's a dumbass)
Miers' Answer Raises Questions
L A Times ^ | 10/22/2005 | David G. Savage,


WASHINGTON — Asked to describe the constitutional issues she had worked on during her legal career, Supreme Court nominee Harriet E. Miers had relatively little to say on the questionnaire she sent to the Senate this week.

And what she did say left many constitutional experts shaking their heads.

At one point, Miers described her service on the Dallas City Council in 1989. When the city was sued on allegations that it violated the Voting Rights Act, she said, "the council had to be sure to comply with the proportional representation requirement of the Equal Protection Clause."

But the Supreme Court repeatedly has said the Constitution's guarantee of "equal protection of the laws" does not mean that city councils or state legislatures must have the same proportion of blacks, Latinos and Asians as the voting population.

"That's a terrible answer. There is no proportional representation requirement under the equal protection clause," said New York University law professor Burt Neuborne, a voting rights expert. "If a first-year law student wrote that and submitted it in class, I would send it back and say it was unacceptable."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-miers22oct22,0,1244386.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hence, the recommendation that she take a 'crash course'
in Constitutional law. Why don't they just nominate a first year law student?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. That answer sounds deliberate. It sounds like they are trying to
imply the word "quota", a word that always rallies and unites the neo-fascists, the born-against, and the racists with you average, Joe sixpack Republican. It lets them feel victimized and powerless.

"On no! Racial quotas!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hubris of nominating an anti-intellectual just because of her "faith"
The appalling abuse of wh power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. She Needs To Read This....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yup, and maybe this too
Edited on Sat Oct-22-05 11:42 AM by sandyd921
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abbeyco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Was Scarriet a C student too?
Just like her teen-crush idol, shrub?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Harriet Liars. She's gotta be one of Bush's secret drinkin buddies.
It would explain the hair and makeup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yep. Saucemonster if I ever saw one.
:beer:

n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. They pretty much did send it back for a do-over...
She said she's going to submit more details and Specter & Leahy said they are waiting for more. This is really quite sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC