Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't the IWR clearly unconstitutional? Why has nobody challenged it in

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 09:58 PM
Original message
Isn't the IWR clearly unconstitutional? Why has nobody challenged it in
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 10:07 PM by karlrschneider
Federal court? I'm sure this question has been asked but I don't remember ever seeing a rational answer.
:eyes:

edit: Iraq War Resolution....sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's the IWR?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Iraq War Resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh.
Thanks!

:hi:

When acronyms are used without any context, I'm often quickly lost. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Presidential war powers is a rather unsettled area of Constitutional law,
I think. For a half-century, presidents have pretty much chosen to do what they want to and dared Congress to stop them.

I don't think right now would be the best time to try for a ruling from the SCOTUS on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You're right of course but dammit someone has to -try-....
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I'd worry about what this Court would do on that subject.
Let's see how they handle the Guantanamo gulag....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. And what court would rule on that?
SCOTUS, right. The same SCOTUS that installed W in 2000, and is now even further right, is going to declare the IWR unconstitutional?

Tell me what you have been drinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Crown Royal.
:D

Remember the same court killed the TX sodomy laws. Impossible to know what they would do in any given case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dems have to admit they were duped before they
challenge anything. Then a dialogue can begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Duped my eye. Dems were complicit - at least a lot of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. If Colin Powell insinuates he was duped, I think it
happened to many people on both sides of the aisle. It would be nice to know the truth either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, I wasn't duped. I could see it from 3,000 miles. Hard to believe
Edited on Sun Oct-23-05 10:58 PM by funflower
these career inside-the-beltwayers really believed that pack of lies. It seems to me they went along to get along and now they're jumping ship like rats on the Titanic. Seems to me that most of them are doing whatever works at the time.....

And I'm not duped by them, either.

:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clair Callan
A former state congressman has challenged it. SCOTUS refused to hear the case.

http://www.google.com/search?num=20&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22Clair+Callan%22+war+powers&btnG=Search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC