The RNC Owes The USA $100Million (Perjury Not A Crime - KBH)

[stopbush]

Geez, if perjury isn't a crime, then the whole Starr investigation/Clinton impeachment was a sham.

When can we expect the check from the RNC reimbursing the US Treasury for the money they wasted prosecuting a non-crime? And what about all of those Congresspeople who voted to impeach (and convict) Clinton over what they knew weren't crimes at all? Aren't they also guilty of perjury...not that it's a crime?

[niyad]

1. but don't you understand--if the repukes do it, it ISN'T a crime, if the

dems do it, it IS a crime.

[Zynx]

4. Makes perfect sense to me.

[kster]

2. K-n-R..NT

[ComerPerro]

3. They owe Clinton a ton of money too, then, for his legal bills

[Fridays Child]

5. I'm waiting for the retroactive un-impeachment.

Yeah, that's gonna happen, too. :eyes:

[papau]

6. Clinton PERJURY CONVICTION NEVER HAPPENED

Clinton PERJURY CONVICTION NEVER HAPPENED

In the civil suit the judge cited and fined him for contempt for misleading testimony - testimony that was literally accurate and truthful but effectively misleading. That's the sole finding. His law license was suspended for five years - not by the Court but by the local -State of AK -bar association. In addition the questions asked by the Jones attorneys were not material to that matter as it was a Civil Rights action and not a harrassment suit - and when there is no materiality, there can be no perjury. The Grand Jury asking about what he said in the deposition of the Jones case, and his repeating the same answer about a non-material matter, is still non-material, and so no perjury was ever committed, from a legal point of view. FOR THE MEDIA TYPES THAT LIE AND SAY THAT IS JUST AN OPINION PLEASE NOTE CITE(Cite: Mann & Roberts)

The House impeachment is just an accusation for the Senate to review - and the Jones perjury event - that did not exist - did not make it out as an impeachment charge - losing by a 205-229 vote. And the grand jury impeachment charge for when the questions asked were about what he said in the deposition of the Jones case, he was repeating the same answer about a non-material matter, which is still non-material. Hence, no perjury was ever committed, from a legal point of view. (Cite: Mann & Roberts)

[RobertSeattle]

7. IOKTPIYAR

It's OK to Perjure If You're a Republican