|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Mithras61 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:48 PM Original message |
Texas Marriage Amendment bans MARRIAGE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WritingIsMyReligion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. ROFLMAO n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. so once the first marriage is performed between one man and one woman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shenmue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. So the entire institution ought to collapse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cally (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. too funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. makes more sense here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. real killer is "similar to marriage" that ends ALL domestic partnerships |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Oh I see, not only bans marriage in TX, but bans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithras61 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. I copied it from... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. Transplant their collective brains into a chicken.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rkc3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Lewis Black pointed out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
29. And that changes things how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. begiling! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindsay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. It would seem that someone was not very careful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. really badly drafted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. This just demonstrates what a group of morans the Texas Lege is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shenmue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
10. Oh man is that bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMarple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. Or perhaps, Harriet Miers?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. It prohibits creating a duplicate to marriage not marriage itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Here's the full text |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. walt- I read this to mean that persons not married |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithras61 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Ah, but it it doesn't exclude marriage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
13. BWAHAHAHAHA!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
18. Had no idea TEXASS was sucha PROGRESSIVE State! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
19. Hmmm, it's almost as if they wrote it so poorly that it wouldn't stand up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
20. Nah, its just very specific wording |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithras61 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I understand what they were trying to do, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Comer- correct they will not allow marriage other than the one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Village Idiot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
23. Some of you people SERIOUSLY have to learn to read... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 06:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. LITERALLY, what it means is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abbeyco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
25. Did Scarriet Miers write that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
30. Well, logically speaking, it does seem to have an internal contradiction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
31. Website: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
32. Maybe marriage is only for George and Laura |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
33. I went to vote early. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 05:49 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. That's funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sonias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Good move Bouncy Ball |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
34. Seems like they should ban marriage betwixt siblings. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC