Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressman Conyers: Pre-Emptive War Against Patrick Fitzgerald

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:50 PM
Original message
Congressman Conyers: Pre-Emptive War Against Patrick Fitzgerald
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 03:11 PM by understandinglife
As if spin and character attacks were a viable justification for a massive breach of national security, Republicans have already decided to smear Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald rather than take responsibility for their own misdeeds. Prevailing wisdom expects grand jury indictments to be issued this week. Any criminal charges will likely reach deep into the White House.

Over the weekend, the GOP spin machine gave us a preview of what we can expect from the Republican Party when we finally learn who outed CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson.

The New York Times reports that “allies of the White House suggested Sunday that they intended to pursue a strategy of attacking any criminal charges as a disagreement over legal technicalities or the product of an overzealous prosecutor” and that, in what appears to be a coordinated Congressional and White House attack, “allies of the White House have quietly been circulating talking points in recent days among Republicans sympathetic to the administration, seeking to help them make the case that bringing charges like perjury mean the prosecutor does not have a strong case."

Before the Congress and the American people can consider the possibility of a White House cover up, it will have to penetrate the smokescreen of character assassination and RNC talking points. This sort of misdirection is nothing new to this White House. The weapons they will use will be the same used to defame Ambassador Joe Wilson; in the words of a Republican Congressional aide months ago, “it’s slime and defend.”

<clip>

More at the link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-conyers/preemptive-war-against-p_b_9427.html

And, to the link at Conyersblog.com:

http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000282.htm


He just keeps on leading on all the crucial issues.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cobaindrain Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. well, it's already started on the right wing radio
Hannity launches some pre-emptive smear bombs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Limbaugh did it too, as expected.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobaindrain Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. this is uber desperation mode
really they've already resigned that something big is going to happen. The repugs are just hoping it's something huge(libby/rove) and not something enormous (cheney :toast:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Anything less than getting that bastard Cheney,
would be the ultimate letdown IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Will it stop at Cheney?
I mean, where does the buck actually stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I just think that Bush will pull some
shit, like "plausible deniablility".

Cheney's been running this crap since day one. I want him!! I wanna watch the PNAC go down in flames.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. seems to me that I read somewhere that bush is responsible for
everything his underlings say and do whether he knows about it or not. so plausible deniability won't fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Bush "responsible" = saying San Diego ckn resp for Padres loss
To quote SNL: "Saying Bush is responsible for anything in this government is like blaming the San Diego chicken when the Padres lose. He's just a big fuzzy mascot."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. I have a feeling it might be cheney. And if it is I wonder..
If it didn't work when Clinton tried to lie his way out of people's intrigue in him, what makes them think it would work with him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am so sick of Republicans and their smear machine.
This is getting so old. It even has its own slang term now: swiftboating. So, they're going to swiftboat Fitzgerald, huh? Are they going to swiftboat the entire grand jury, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximovich Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I Wouldn't Pass It By Them
Then we stomp on them with the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. U know, that was the one thing I looked forward to when
Clinton left office and Bush entered. I thought "Well, at least the Republicans won't be doing 24/7 smear attacks any more."

Little did I know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. Haha...it only got worse, didn't it?
I was a political ostrich until shrub. I am not amused by the Republican smear machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Never imagined it, but it did get worse.
And I've got a good imagination, too!

A lesson I learned in junior high was to never cave in to a bully, for it just emboldens them. I've now learned it clearly applies to politics as well.

Give 'em fits, Fitz. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
18.  Yep ..... and they will get away with it...
with the help of the media and their spinsters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. "overzealous prosecutor” "--seems to the aides were overzealous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Dubya's words will come back to haunt him again.
In contrast, Bush has publicly praised Fitzgerald's investigation, saying earlier this month that "he's doing it in a very dignified way."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/24/AR2005102401029.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. Overzealous in the sense that he actually appears to be doing his job
something Bushco must view with bafflement and alarm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R..NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. I just love John Conyers
He's the one Democrat I can count on that is seriously paying attention to what's going on. He's the MAN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. the one and possibly ONLY... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. Remember when he held those hearings in the basement of
the Capitol with Cindy Sheehan, Joe Wilson, Ray McGovern and Jon Bonifaz?

There were a number of other Representatives who came down to lend Conyers support. I wish they would act as a BLOC...maybe call themselves the 'Bloc for Democracy.' I want to see a HUGE GROUP working in Congress. I don't think the Senate is up for it...except mayber Boxer. Who else has a spine in the Senate? Kennedy. I am so tired of Reid and his squeaky little voice with his new little phrase for '06...'America Can Do Better.'

Again, if you feel like calling the Hill and giving some of the Dems a pep talk on FIGHTING FOR DEMOCRACY......here are the toll free numbers:

1-800-828-0498 or 1-800-247-2971

Thx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Time for the DRAFT!
Draft Conyers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flying_wahini Donating Member (856 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. just remind rw's that Fitzgerald was appointed by Ashcroft......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. No. He was appointed by Comey. Ashcroft had to recuse himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. wish the dems could coordinate talking points nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. I don't mind the lack of coordination
I do mind that I frequently hear Democrats *repeating* Republican talking points, and it is almost a given that they are completely unprepared to rebut these same points even when they have been in circulation for days and the internet is full of clear and simple fact-based rebuttals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. He does come from an absolutely safe area you know!
And as minority leader of the judiciary committee he has the power behind him to keep doing what he's doing.

My suspicion is that this is not happenstance, but is planned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Fighting fire with Gasoline
It's the only thing they really know how to do. They can't govern, they can't fight, they can't tell the truth, they can't solve problems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. So they are not even going to try to say they're innocent.
Just not guilty of anything very bad.

Fuck 'em.

They're doomed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. Spin is not evidence
Say it with me
Spin is not evidence.

They can say whatever they want on TV. They can say whatever they want about the charges or the prosecutor but it's all powerless spin. Once there are indictments it is no longer political but judicial. The only court that matters is the federal court and the only thing that matters is the evidence available (if there is any) to defend these criminals. They are still fighting in the court of public opinion and let them because that fight is meaningless. Once their crimes are part of the court systems they can only watch and suffer.

Spin is not evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. Yep. I've been saying that all day. We're on the same wavelength.
Still I refuse to be optimistic. I'll believe this when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Good news!
This means that indictments, lots of them, are on the way! I celebrate the fait accompli that is demonstrated by the new Death Cult Marching Orders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
23. Conyers is excellent
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 03:23 PM by hiley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. this is already in play with the Delay case
its their standard generic rebuttal

Most Americans now see through their tripe. Most are smarter than the thugs think they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
30. Salon: "Long ago, Washington's political attack dogs resigned themselves
.... to the fact that they have nothing on special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald. The man is so squeaky clean that just about the only dirt besmirching his public record concerns long work hours that made him ineligible to adopt a cat. Later this week, the most powerful men and women in the country will sit helplessly on the sidelines as Fitzgerald decides whether to indict White House officials in the case of Valerie Plame, a clandestine CIA agent whose identity was leaked to the press by the Bush administration.

But as soon as Fitzgerald announces his decision, in a press conference, a walk from the grand jury room to the magistrate's office in U.S. District Court, or a posting on his Web site, the political détente will end. The knives will come out. It will be an all-out rhetorical war.

<clip>

The renewed focus on the actions of the White House in the marketing of the war is a narrative that many policy wonks and historians hope gains traction. For each fact known about the White House's work with intelligence -- such as the fact that Vice President Cheney made repeated visits to the CIA -- several unanswered questions remain. "If indictments are handed down it reopens that entire subject," says Joseph Cirincione, the director of nonproliferation at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "Some books are hard to shut. And this one is about to pop back open."



From Plame Games by Michael Scherer on October 24, 2005

Link:

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/10/24/plame/print.html


And, this is a book that all of us, like the folk at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, want kept open until all the truth is known.


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. They'll make crap up if they can't find anything
Hope Fitz is ready. He's a smart man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
32. Their agitation is music to my ears.
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 03:54 PM by smoogatz
What's beautiful about any indictments brought in this case is that conviction is almost a sure thing. Any jury empaneled in DC is likely to be 80-90% African American. Bush's approval rating with African Americans is, given the margin of error, somewhere between 4% and zero.

Sean, Rush--can you say FROG MARCH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. It's so unbelievably hard to understand
How anyone wants a government that operates under such corruption. Just because it's their party, why would anyone with any sort of integrity want our government to be so evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I've noticed in our political culture that W and his neocons have
seemed to turn the political arena into something like a sports arena. I think Rove has used propaganda and manipulation techniques on the 'good ol' boys.' By 'good ol' boys' I mean (and I am being very general) white, not well-educated, working class (therefore losing self-esteem due to dwindling paychecks and jobs) with racist and sexist tendencies. And of course, they like guns since that tends to give them self-esteem.

These men, with the help of Rush, the Drug Addict, have been prodded into thinking that politics is a game to be WON or LOST...it has nothing to do with peoples' lives. And in the name of Winning, all tactics are acceptable. After all, politics is dirty. Lying is acceptable, smear tactics are fun and entertaining....it's all a game to them....until maybe someone in their circle is harmed in the Iraq war.

And because they are not well-educated, logic and reason have no place in their world....I find the only technique that works on them is ridicule. Of course, you gotta remember they have those guns right handy in their pick-up trucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. It's simple
They don't have any sort of integrity. All they care about is winning, and they don't care whether their tactics are ethical or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
north houston dem Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
37. Goddess bless Poppa Conyers
he leads us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
40. Hannity was attacking Comey today
he went over Comey's cases like "Pardongate" when he said it was a set up that Clinton would walk away from the Rich pardon and insinuated that Comey was paid off. He kept referring to Comey as Fitzgerald's good friend. He stated that Comey and Fitzgerald were "best" friends that socialize regularly. Then he called Fitzgerald's appointment "chronyism." I sat there peeing my pants cause I was laughing so much.

Hannity couldn't find anything more to say about Fitzgerald than "overzealous prosecutor" so he attacked Comey instead. It was so pitiful it turned into a comedy. They are soooooo freaked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. They will display their lameness for all it is as they try to diminish ...
.... Comey and Fitzgerald. We should all do everything we can to help them keep digging the hole they are already expanding and deepening. ;)


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
45. Conyers wrote Bush again...
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 07:54 PM by hiley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
46. Conyers makes me proud to be a Democrat!
He is always leading the party on all the crucial issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
47. I hope Fitzgerald's findings puts a huge smile on Rep. Conyers' face
No one deserves to see justice done more than Rep. Conyers. I've never seen a more hard-working congressperson than he has been at representing the people's interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC