Jackson4Gore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:53 PM
Original message |
Petition: Draft Al Gore for President in 2008 |
tk2kewl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message |
1. signed it a couple of days ago |
ed murrow
(88 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I love him & I know he invented the internet |
|
But No Thanks
I am a Wesley Clark man
|
Scout1071
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
15. Clark would be an excellent VP. Gore/Clark '08! |
drummo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
22. Gore would never pick someone who supported the IWR |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
28. And Clark never did..... |
|
He supported the same one Dean supported...remember?
|
Why Syzygy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
marylanddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If he promises to not enlist Lieberman or use |
|
that republicrat woman (can't think of her name even though she's famous) who ran his last campaign.
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I think that's how she spells it.
|
drummo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
17. Donna Brazile ran his campaign. And you are right. He let him down. |
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Proud To Be Number 1,110 |
|
To sign the petition.
Al Gore has been, is, and will be my President.
|
Autonomy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |
Bernardo de La Paz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
7. 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 |
|
2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006
|
Jackson4Gore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. You know, people can do two things at once |
|
I happen to be the Vice Chair of my local democratic party and am working my butt off on local, state, and national 2006 elections. However, I am also going to push this for 2008.
Just becuase someone talks about 2008, that doesn't mean they are doing nothing about 2006.
|
drummo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
18. Yes Dems will win in 2006 |
rzemanfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I'd like him to be Vice-President to John Kerry after Kerry is |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 05:14 PM by rzemanfl
appointed to the House of Representatives, elected Speaker and Bush and Cheney are impeached. I say this only because he is younger than Kerry and I'd like Gore to be elected President in 2016, when Kerry is done and stay in office until January of 2025.
|
drummo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
19. That's quite a plot, man. |
oregonindy
(790 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
11. wouldnt it be great to elect him even if he doesnt run? millions of write |
|
in votes!
frickin knock the corporations out of the picture. :)
|
Poppyseedman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Why in the world would the Democratic party want to make Al Gore their presidential candidate for 2008?
The repugs may be on the ropes today, but 2008 is a long way off.
We have better candidates that will appear.
|
Jackson4Gore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
I seem to recall that was the mantra in 2004. Can you remind me of how that went?
|
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. You also tried to draft him for 2004. How did THAT go? |
drummo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
21. In 2004 the party establishment was against him. 2008 is different. |
drummo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
20. No we don't. Noone has the combo Gore has. |
LittleClarkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
27. Who better than someone who's been through it and |
|
knows where all the potholes are?
Plus, he has the benefit of the "I told you so" factor, as well as increasing nostagia for the Clinton era.
|
Big Kahuna
(903 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
wakemewhenitsover
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message |
23. RE-ELECT PRESIDENT GORE!! |
liberaltrucker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message |
drummo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. The DLC hates Gore. Read this: |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
29. So what about Al Gore and Rwanda? |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 01:12 AM by FrenchieCat
In another thread you were telling me that Gore didn't want to send troups in to save the 800,000 Black folks that were macheted to death there.
Drummo, You said.... "If you want to know Gore would not send US troops to Rwanda if it was happening today. He never flip-flopped on that issue. And the US military is not a toy. You don't send them everywhere where vaious groups are killing each other. By the same token the US military should be in Sudan or should have been in Siera Leone or Somalia."
If what you had said is true Drummo, if this is Al Gore's true stance on what happened in Rwanda, than I'm sorry....as a Human being and a Black American, I cannot say how deeply this troubles me, and I cannot support him...!
In fact, you also said....:"But it's none of our business and it's not a US national security issue. Again, no US troops were killed in Rwanda and noone was killed by the US military in Rwanda. There were not strategic conseuneces.
There were not US guard troops sent to Africa so we would end up with a shortage here at home.
And Gore had been consistently against sending US troops for combat mission to Rwanda.
He regeretted that we didn't send the humanitarian mission earlier but he never said that we should have intervene militraly in way , for example, we did in the Balkans."
Please tell me this isn't so! Please don't tell me that Gore didn't want to do for Rwanda what he ended up pushing for in Kosovo!
|
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
26. As long as he stays true to himself. |
|
He's at the top of my list.
DONE.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:06 AM
Response to Original message |