Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On the eve of indictments - prediction time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:03 PM
Original message
On the eve of indictments - prediction time
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 06:16 PM by Ugnmoose
Based upon disclosure that Fitz has been investigating forged Niger documents for some time, along with other evidence of the widening of his investigation beyond the outing of CIA Agent Plame, including the collaboration of efforts with McNulty's Grand Jury, here is my prediction:

All key members of WHIG's (Cheney, Rove, Libby, Hadley, Rice)will be indicted on violations of Espionage Act and Treason against U.S. for fabricating documents and evidence presented to the U.S. Congress in an effort to bring us to War with Iraq. Depending on what was told to Grand Jury, there will also be conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury charges. Bush will also be indicted for similar charges for statements made in State of Union address. Hannah and Wurmser will be indicted, but plead to lesser charges in return for their testimony to the GJ as well as some lower level staffers. Judy Miller will also be indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice. Michael Ledeen will be tied to Franklin/AIPAC case and similarly indicted for treason/espionage. Colin Powell has turned and provided important information to GJ to help make case for treason/espionage, also much cooperation from CIA and foreign government sources.

All in all, I think the charges will be much more severe and wide ranging than anyone imagines. Stay tuned - it won't be long now.

On Edit: As an aside, Novakula flipped early on to point the finger at Rove and possibly others as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. TERRA in Chicago the day the Indictment bomb drops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems plausible -- jaw dropping, yes -- but plausible
there is no hard and fast rule that says a sitting president CANNOT be indicted, but Bush would be the first were your scenario to come true. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They indicted Clinton
AND impeached him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Clinton was not indicted!
Edited on Tue Oct-25-05 07:21 AM by Perky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whoa
If that happens DU might implode!

You really think so? All of them? Espionage and Treason?

OMG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not to mention
that this would make Watergate seem like jaywalking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geekgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would love for all that to be true-- what would happen if Cheney were
indicted? I know a sitting president can't be (although bushy-boy could achive the first honor), but what about Cheney? Has a VP ever been indicted?

I tend to think everyone BUT Cheney (and Bush) will be indicted. But, Cheney will follow with a resignation later on.

I am crossing my fingers that this blows the roof off the Bush Crime family!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DelawareValleyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Aaron Burr was indicted while VP
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 06:44 PM by DelawareValleyDem
he faced murder charges in NY and NJ for the fatal duel with Hamilton. I believe Agnew reached a plea agreement before he was formally indicted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. You may be right. I think the leak-proof info blackout from Fitz's
office is damning. Had this been a low-level affair we would have had at least a few snippets along the way. Fitz turned Novak early and has spent the rest of the time building an air-tight and all-encompassing case.

Or...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Treason is "aiding and abetting the enemy"
People throw that word around a lot, but its application here is a fantasy, much as I wish it wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiegranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow, you're thinking BIG
I can believe all except Rice and Bush. I think they'll skate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. WOW. I hope you are correct! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think there will be treason charges.
That's just a very large jump. Understand, that I think treason could be appropriate in this case, I just don't think that the GJ is likely to go that route at this time.

There could indeed be espionage charges, but that will likely be against the original leaker and not the whole cabal.

The big charges against everybody might be criminal conspiracy. They could do this either as conspiracy to obstruct justice (for the cover-up) or, if Fitz really has a lock on these bums, conspiracy to violate the espionage laws.

I think the majority of charges will be perjury, obstruction of justice, and the lesser conspiracy charges (which themselves are not minor charges).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hate to say it, but this sounds like wishful thinking.
I think we'll see a count or two of espionage, at the most; but multiple indictments on multiple counts of obstruction, conspiracy and perjury. Six to eight Bushco functionaries will end up going to minimum security prisons for 6-18 months, where they'll play tennis, write their memoirs, and attend the G. Gordon Liddy School of Broadcasting. which will be an entirely satisfatory outcome for me. Best of all possible cases--Cheney forced to resign, but pardoned by Bush because of his health. Nixon was pardoned (so the story went) because he had phlebitis in his leg, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Holy shit, if that happened, I'd have to take a few days off work
to recover. I would be giggling and laughing and generally acting like a frigging mental patient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. AAH, but you too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. You know, that is exactly what I thought
I couldn't teach a class if this was going on. I'd have to take personal leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phusion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. I believe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Dear god in heaven
let it be so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let's not forget
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 06:37 PM by Emit
RE your statement:

"Bush will also be indicted for similar charges for statements made in State of Union address."

Bush's 16 words in his SOTU address referred to British intelligence, and the WH, while subsequently backtracking on that whole uranium/yellow cake issue, also has repeated numerous times that Bush was relying on independent British intelligence when he made that statement.

While there is some speculation that the Brits were referring to the same forged Niger docs, they (Blair) have come out numerous times and stated that their intelligence was independent and separate from the forged Niger documents.

Until evidence can show that the Brits were involved, and/or that their intelligence was dependent on the forged Niger documents or some equally lame source, I think it will be difficult to go very far with this specific issue, technically. I do still think that the forged documents is a major issue, and should be part of the investigation, and that those who were involved should be brought to justice. I just think that by having the SOTU address be based on the Brits' intelligence gave Bush a way out.

I hope I'm wrong, and I hope further evidence will contradict the Brits' claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wow you are shooting for the whole shebang!
I doubt it will go that high. The worst thing (in the eyes of the RW) that can happen in all this is Cheney is forced to resign and Rove has to pay a big fine and resign as well. I would settle for that much too if the facts take it that far.

If it takes it higher??? Then wow we are talking huge historical event here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. If that were true, I don't know what I'd do with myself. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. I think we are are going to be stunned
I think Cheney is going to be indicted on Perjury charge. Perhaps not right away but before Libby goes to trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC