|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 08:52 PM Original message |
Latest RW talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atommom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, I agree that we had sufficient facts to make an intelligent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cantstandbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 08:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Clinton had the same facts and made the right decision. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. And they spent how many years investigating Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leftist_Warrior (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. And over a damn BJ! C'mon, he didn't drag us into a WAR! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. At every turn, they made the WRONG decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. They were using incorrect information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:17 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. They had the right info. They had the wrong policy agenda(s). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atommom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 07:26 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. That's it in a nutshell. They had the right info, and they had staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. We were lied to over and over and over again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. We who? We "us" (american public) or we "them" (the bushies)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 08:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. The American public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atommom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 07:34 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Most of the *public* didn't have sufficient facts, but our government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canadian Socialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. To be honest, it's crap like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KerryOn (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
9. I don't think they did have all the facts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC