hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 08:04 AM
Original message |
A restraining order from Congress prohibiting military action against any |
|
other countries. Now, I don't know if this can be done. Clearly this administration is on the fast track to Syria. What can be done to stop any more wars of aggression against targets predetermined years ago by these psychos?
|
jody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 08:06 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Congress can only impeach or control the budget. Bush has a veto |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-25-05 08:13 AM by jody
proof position on any law Congress might pass that limits his power.
|
Im with Rosey
(619 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
we need to put a restraining order on each and every action this evil empire tries to do, up to and including waking up in the morning!
|
ms liberty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message |
3. VietNam actually ended because |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-25-05 08:27 AM by ms liberty
Congress quit funding it, didn't it? And it was the whole reason for Iran-Contra, too, if I remember correctly. Congress wouldn't fund the Contras, so the proto-neocons of Raygun sold arms to Iran to pay for their war. One of the reasons Congress holds the power of the purse is to exercise a check upon the executive branch. This is a really interesting subject in itself (well, to me anyway), read Senator Robert Byrd, it's one of the committees he's always been on; and he is, as usual, quite eloguent on the subject. But, the short version is that if Congress would cut off frat boy's credit, he wouldn't be able to play warrior all over the globe, and he'd have to get his toys and come home...
Another reason to take Congress in '06.
edited: grammer
|
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I don't have any confidence |
|
that if congress stopped funding iraq that the war would end. shrubco would just find some illegal means of getting money or he would just abandon our troops with what resources they already have. "No bullets? You still have them there bayonets don't ya? Democracy on the march screamed the AWOL chimp!!!"
|
Geoff R. Casavant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Congress granted the authority |
|
Presumably with enough political will Congress can rescind that authority.
|
sweetheart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
6. There was also a citizen's veto |
|
Granted by the second amendment, intended to keep all men humble, that if a citizen would put their life on the line to veto, then its time for new government, or at least time for a new politician to replace the one who fell to earth.
These men are criminals, due process should be enough to take them down, or there is not a prayer of hope that the system can deliver justice for anyone else, anywhere in the world. Taking bush down to justice is core.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message |