Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Daily News: WH defense will be that aides "simply got tripped up"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:33 AM
Original message
NY Daily News: WH defense will be that aides "simply got tripped up"
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/story/359006p-305893c.html


Bushies take aim at probe

BY KENNETH R. BAZINET
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU


<snip>

Behind the scenes, however, Team Bush was finalizing its campaign to discredit and undermine special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's conclusions, sources told the Daily News.

The White House strategy is counting on major help from GOP allies and neocon commentators who turned on Bush for naming Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court and are now looking for redemption with a miffed President.

An emerging theme in the Bush war room is arguing that his top political aide, Karl Rove, simply got tripped up on his recollections of whom he talked to and what he told them when questioned about the outing of CIA spy Valerie Plame. He shouldn't be indicted simply because of contradictory grand jury testimony, a source said.

Bush allies have already begun casting perjury and obstruction charges as irrelevant in a probe created to find out who leaked classified information.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Supidest. Lamest. Excuse. Ever.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. But yet, you know that 30% of the population will fall for it.
:grr:, right there with you buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Perjury and obstruction were good enough to impeach Clinton.
I think they're good enough for the Regime. But not to worry, there'll be treason indictments a-plenty too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. As in on the way to cushy appointments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Search Party Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, I see. The Steve Martin Defense: "I forgot!" eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think this will wash
Fitzgerald has got stuff on all of them. And the i's have all been dotted, the t's all crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. these guys are slime........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. Other possible defenses, suggested by The Editors
at http://www.thepoorman.net/

1. Cheney cannot have coordinated the smearing of Wilson because strawberries are yummier than cranberries.
2. Libby cannot have perjured himself because my birthday is next Thursday.
3. George W. Bush cannot have known who was responsible for the leak because peeance freeance.

But getting tripped up incompetence works, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Tripping their way into treason.
:spray: and they got caught lying to a grand jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. Remember this old Steve Martin bit?
You.. can be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes! You can be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes! You say.. "Steve.. how can I be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes?" First.. get a million dollars. Now.. you say, "Steve.. what do I say to the tax man when he comes to my door and says, 'You.. have never paid taxes'?" Two simple words. Two simple words in the English language: "I forgot!" How many times do we let ourselves get into terrible situations because we don't say "I forgot"? Let's say you're on trial for armed robbery. You say to the judge, "I forgot armed robbery was illegal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. Jebus. Barney ate my subpoena would be more believable
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. That's the ticket! Blame everything on Barney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Awww....Geee, can't you guys do better!!!
"arguing that his top political aide, Karl Rove, simply got tripped up on his recollections"

See folks, it was just a simple mistake.....:sarcasm:

"whom he talked to and what he told them when questioned"

Why Karl talks to many, many, people each and every day.....:sarcasm:

"He shouldn't be indicted simply because of contradictory grand jury testimony"

No, no, he was just tired, and maybe his blood sugar was low, and....

Wait a minute...That's it.....Karl was contradictory 'cause he needed a Twinky!!!!!

Ahh, the "Twenky Defense" circa 2005 :bounce:


(Well why not, this crap they're saying now ain't workin')
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. Oh, the dog ate my homework. What a bullshit story. Good luck boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. They're trying to reinforce defenses at "Firewall #1" as I described it.
Firewall 1 - Admit to an 'error' for 'mistakenly' exposing Valerie Plame.

Firewall 2 - Have junior staffers take the perjury fall for something motivated by political retribution.

Firewall 3 - Have senior staffers take the perjury and obstruction fall for something motivated by political retribution.

Firewall 4 - Have Cheney take the conspiracy fall for something motivated by political retribution.

Firewall 5 - Admit guilt for deliberate political retribution.

Firewall 6 - Admit attempt to cover up knowledge of false 'intelligence' in arguing for invasion of Iraq.

Core being defended - Deliberate destruction of CIA intelligence assets that were exposing corruption in Corporate/federal dealings in the Middle East, clearing the way in the future for corrupt corporate profiteering and weapons dealing in South Asia and the Middle East.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=5150627&mesg_id=5150962

These corrupt bastards are so damned predictable! :grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC