Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cabal News Network officially onboard BushCo indictment spin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:45 AM
Original message
Cabal News Network officially onboard BushCo indictment spin
Lunch hour fill-in dufus just vehemently defended BushCo to Bill "AEI" Schneider re: the coming indictments. "But Bill, there's a problem here...should these people be indicted over what amounts to a technicality over recollections of who said what?"

Here we go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. RW spin word - "technicality"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Francine Frensky Donating Member (870 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. So perjury and obstruction are now "technicalities"??
I'm so old I remember when we had a president who was impeached over a "technicality". and it had nothing to do with national security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let me guess: It was Rush's bimbo, Daryn, asking the 'tech'
question, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wait, you mean like what really constitutes "sexual relations"?
Nah, can't be that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is that Clancy?
I get CNNI at noon for one hour. Clancy is on an said after the twerp's speech how "POWERFUL" it was. :eyes:

I expected more from CNNI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. It must be Clancy...
Big guy, grey hair, fifties...

What a fucking jerk-off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Found his pic... Jim Clancy


he is one of the worst.. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Hey...that's the guy...but I found a different picture
(How convenient that he happened to be wearing one of my shirts! LOL!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. LOL!
nice. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, North and the other Iran-Contra slime were absolved...
of their "technicalities", why not this gang?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good, now I am free to lie to a jury and obstruct justice. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. It Doesn't Matter What the Hell they Say. Who Cares. Spin On you Fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Well sure
I can hear Luskin's closing argument at Rove's trial: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you cannot possibly convict my client. We just got the overnight poll numbers and Mr. Rove's negatives are down two points among likely voters! We are out in front of this story dammit!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, and they just ran an anti-Ronnie Earl Tom Delay ad over the break!
Edited on Tue Oct-25-05 12:01 PM by calipendence
Daryn Cagan must be getting too much power as their news "producer" over there or something! Bums! What we really need is a Democracy Now setup that can have special reports for news when it happens so that we're not infected with this constant corporate media BS! I wonder if we could talk Ted Turner into starting a Counter Cable News Network company to counter what CNN has become. Has he completely divested himself of AOL/CNN stock yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Guess what news article said this a.m.
On Washington Journal. They read a small blurb that said that the Dems and Repukes are working on their response for when the indictments come down. Dems are going to pound on the "culture of corruption" thing and endangering national security, etc. Wondered what the repukes were working on but assumed it was to trivialize, etc. and then BINGO it already shows up. As I posted elsewhere, even Fineman, Blankly, etc. said that this won't fly and is the worst thing the repukes or the administration can do. Let's watch them hang themselves some more..........pass the popcorn, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC