Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Icon Says "The Days Of The Blank Check Have Ended." Now What?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:43 PM
Original message
Conservative Icon Says "The Days Of The Blank Check Have Ended." Now What?
Most conservatives have stood with Bush from the beginning. Those of us who know him like him. We’ve swallowed policies we might otherwise have objected to because we’ve believed that he and those around him are themselves conservatives trying to do the right thing against sometimes terrible odds. We’ve been there for him because we’ve considered ourselves part of his team.

No more.

From now on, this administration will find it difficult to muster support on the right without explaining why it should be forthcoming. The days of the blank check have ended because no thinking conservative really wants to be part of a team that requires marching in lock step without question or thought, even if it is headed by the president of the United States.

-- David A. Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union, Oct. 17

***

Does that mean the party over?

Nearly five years after Bush's questionable presidency began, maybe conservatives are finally catching on. Do a search for reaction to what Keene said, and you see a lot of conservatives sitting on their hands. Sen. George Allen (R-VA), on yesterday's edition of NBC's Meet the Press, didn't give an answer to Tim Russert's simple question: "Do you share that view?"

Sure, it isn't politically correct at this juncture to completely jump ship. But some well-known Republicans -- like Sens. Santorum (R-PA), Lott (R-MS), McCain (R-AZ), Hagel (R-NE), Graham (R-SC) and Brownback (R-KS) -- have publicly disagreed with the Bush Administration on a variety of issues, most recently the nomination of Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court, the slow federal response to Hurricane Katrina, fiscal responsibility after the hurricane, Social Security privatization and federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.

But Keene's statement takes this disagreement to a whole new level. Keene voices something that maybe a lot of Republicans have privately been feeling. He's had enough of Bush's B.S.

***

It's a good time to abandon ship. After all, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) may be in trouble. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) may be in trouble. Senior White House Advisor Karl Rove, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, and National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley (and maybe several others in the administration) may be in trouble.

But, it's just as possible that all of the above will be found innocent of any wrongdoing. Read the conservative blogs, or listen to the conservative pundits, and you hear that Frist did nothing wrong, DeLay is the victim of a partisan witch hunt, and at worst, Rove and Libby will be found guilty of obstruction of justice and-or perjury, rather than anything directly related to the treasonous act of exposing a covert CIA operative. (Although that sort of crime didn't prevent conservatives from seeking Bill Clinton's impeachment, for perjuring himself about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, even though Kenneth Starr's Whitewater investigation found no wrongdoing tied to the Arkansas land deal that gave the investigation its name.)

***

But if Keene is correct -- if the days of the "blank check" are over -- then regardless of who is convicted and who is innocent, the party's singular voice, and the might that comes with it, could very well be over.

Maybe Keene is reacting simply to the Miers nomination. Maybe he realizes that Bush, with a popularity rating of barely 40%, has no coat-tails heading into next year's mid-term elections. Maybe he's just tired of a president who hasn't acted like a fiscal conservative. Or a president who has increased the size of government. Or a president who told us Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (wrong), that the Iraq War would pay for itself through oil revenues (wrong), and that our mission was accomplished (wrong).

The American people voted for Bush, twice, in part because of the conservatives ability to speak with one voice, and to demonize Al Gore and John Kerry as being outside the mainstream. Gore was portrayed as a liar, and Kerry was portrayed as aloof and undeserving of his war medals. The mainstream media, played like fools, went along with this scam, repeating the canard that Gore claimed to invent the Internet, and laughing at him when he talked about learning from his father on the family's Tennessee farm. Four years later, the media gave equal billing to the Swift Boat Veterans, even after it was clearly shown that the Swifties were backed by the same friend of Rove, Robert Perry, who backed the false attacks against John McCain (R-AZ) in the 2000 South Carolina primary, and even after it was clear that the Swifties "truth" was little more than hearsay and partisan-driven rumors. Meanwhile, "liberals" like Maureen Dowd wrote again and again about Kerry being aloof, with Dowd in one column altering a Kerry quote to help repeat the stereotype.

During the last elections, polls showed that Americans preferred to have a barbecue with Bush, or let him run their family business. Even as he crafted policies that favored corporate America or the individiual, the American people were led to believe that Bush was a "regular guy" who was looking out for their best interests -- an image helped greatly by a cohesive Republican Party with a well-crafted message, repeated over and over in the mainstream media.

If Keene is correct, that well-crafted, singular voice won't continue. And Americans will be better off for it.

***

This item first appeared at Journalists Against Bush's B.S.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. how about the days of prosecution for writing bad checks have started
just sayin' :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Conservatives" will embrace "The Days Of The Blank Check Have Ended"
This is the strategy they have always operated under.

Shipped the Treasury to the wealthy and the Military Industrial Complex? Well, gosh and golly gee, those Socialistic programs just HAVE to go. So sorry. No more Social Security, no more Medicare, no more Public Schools, no more National Parks, no more public research....... on and on.... except bridges to nowhere.

This 'blank check' thing is what they've always been about. Why do you think that the first thing St. Reagan and W. did was to run up a massive deficit? This is the process where Grover Norquist gets to drown the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can't trust what they say -
They'll write him another "blank" check very soon. Happens every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree this is the do as we say not as we do conservative generation.
Where has the integrity gone - sarcasam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chi-Town Exile Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll believe it when I see it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC