|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
J-Hen (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:04 PM Original message |
Libby Indicted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YDogg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hmmm .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. what about for Rove? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. No Cheney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. Did it say, "Cheney NOT indicted"? No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:35 PM Original message |
Take a chill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
38. We're all under stress. There's even an anti-Fitzmas thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seen the light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. So far so good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. I'd sure like to know why Tenet wasn't called |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Discovery process could nail him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. Let the storm begin................... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'm really starting to despise Raw Story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack_Dawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Why? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ernesto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. 1 to 5 indicted! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashuaadvocate (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
9. Where does it say this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. it did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Here's link... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashuaadvocate (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. There's no story there--sorry, panties still (therefore) in wad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashuaadvocate (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:14 PM Original message |
I.E. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
32. Wah wah ... I saw the damn thing and it wasn't a hoax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. I just damn saw it on the front page! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. That banner is gone now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Yep. Guess they took it down. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
11. I see that indictment is plural... Have to stay up another night I guess! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
J-Hen (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. ABC News Confirms Libby Indictment according to Drudge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
14. not there presently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
J-Hen (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. It was up there a few minutes ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I saw it. Hmm... Where did it go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
15. Not indicted - He will only be if the grand jury says yes,. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
19. thanks for stirring the pot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the_spectator (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
23. Yeah yeah. Libby indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. And for sucking ass so much he imploded! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
26. drudge is saying he hasn't been indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ernesto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
28. Ah yes, the indictment derby is on atlast!......... n-t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:21 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. hehehehe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 07:46 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. False start.......everyone back in their original positions. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
31. Check out the photo below on the rawstory homepage! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Tooo tired to check what does it say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ramblin_dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
33. ABC NEWS DENIES DRUDGE LIBBY CLAIM... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
35. ABC News denies that any reporter called White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
36. Jumped the gun? I thought Raw Story was ALWAYS right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkusQ (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
37. ABC is denying it and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-25-05 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
40. I'm locking this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC