Binary poll: Do you have a positive or negative opinion of Rawstory?

[arcos]

Not much to add, the subject says it all.

[JDPriestly]

1. Reliability

So far, I have found them reliable. On a scale of one to ten with ten most reliable, I would give them a seven. I would rate them even more highly, but I haven't read Raw Story that long. So, this is my cautious evaluation based on my limited experience.

[stillcool]

2. Positive to my mind...

and enjoyable too!

[joefree1]

3. How about their web site: www.rawstory.com

http://www.rawstory.com/

Just in case anyone is interested. I love it when they deliver an editorial kick to some conservative's groin.

[Stand and Fight]

4. I think they're a fledging organization.

They're not always on the money, but they at least try. I rate them positively -- even though I believe they have an annoying tendency to to overstate a "developing hard" story, etc... However, because of that I would never cite them as a source in a discussion or debate -- at least at this point. They've got a long way to go before I can do that. Overall, I would rate them about a 6.5 out of 10 as a "news" organization. There were those who today compared them to Drudge -- I call bullshit. They're much more honest and I've yet to see them producing Photoshopped pictures and trying to play them off as authentic. Rawstory is LIGHT-YEARS ahead of that rag.

[jim3775]

5. I like raw story. I don't mind the "developing..."

I dont know why people hate it so much.

[marbuc]

6. I have a neutral opinion of raw story

neither negative or positive. I like what I've seen on their site, but don't know if they're reputable or not.

[Bumblebee]

7. I am very grateful they exist and are more often than not accurate!

[TahitiNut]

8. There are two answers to every question ...

... and three or more are usually wrong. :silly:
It's not a binary world; it's quantized. :dunce: