gatorboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 01:40 AM
Original message |
Nuclear "bunker-buster" warhead plan...In the energy dept. bill?? |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 01:43 AM by gatorboy
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration has abandoned research into a nuclear "bunker-buster" warhead, deciding instead to pursue a similar device using conventional weaponry, a key Republican senator said Tuesday.
Sen. Pete Domenici (news, bio, voting record), R-N.M., said funding for the nuclear bunker-buster as part of the Energy Department's fiscal 2006 budget has been dropped at the department's request.
The nuclear bunker-buster had been the focus of intense debate in Congress, with opponents arguing that its development as a tactical nuclear weapon could add to nuclear proliferation.
An administration official, speaking on condition on anonymity because negotiations on the department's spending bill have not yet been completed, confirmed that a decision had been made to concentrate on a nonnuclear bunker-buster. -----------------------------------------------------
Okaayyyy, so maybe I don't know how this works. But how does the Energy Dept. benefit from nuclear warhead plans? I mean, sure, you're using energy to vaporize other countries but shouldn't this be a plan more suited for a military budget? Was this snuck in so it would pass? I was always under the assumption that the energy dept was for...uhhh locating energy...For us. :shrug:
|
Kenroy
(768 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 01:43 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I scanned the story, but missed the fact that it was in the energy department bill. How fucked is that? The Department of Energy isn't supposed to be developing weapons.
|
gatorboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. That's what I'm saying! |
|
I can't say :wtf: enough!
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Department of Energy handles nuclear weapon work. Has for a long time. |
Kenroy
(768 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Well, define "handles" |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 01:47 AM by Kenroy
do they develop new weapons?
On edit:
I guess they do! I was unaware of this. According to the DOE website:
Defense Strategic Goal: To protect our national security by applying advanced science and nuclear technology to the Nation’s defense.
|
Dudley_DUright
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 02:03 AM
Response to Original message |
5. All the nuclear weapons labs like Los Alamos and Sandia |
|
are under Department of Energy control.
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:10 AM
Response to Original message |