Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military's Advice to Reporters: 2,000 Dead in Iraq 'Not a Milestone'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:13 AM
Original message
Military's Advice to Reporters: 2,000 Dead in Iraq 'Not a Milestone'
Oh no, of course not. We reach 2000 deaths in an unnecessary war Quite often, I'm sure.........

U.S. Army Lt. Col. Steve Boylan, director of the force's combined press center, wrote in an e-mail to reporters, "I ask that when you report on the events, take a moment to think about the effects on the families and those serving in Iraq. The 2,000 service members killed in Iraq supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom is not a milestone. It is an artificial mark on the wall set by individuals or groups with specific agendas and ulterior motives."


http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001351291
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Danmel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. "An artificial mark on the wall?"
I'd like him to say tht to the parents of these dead men and women. There is something seriously wrong with these people, there really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing to see here. Move along.
So if you pay attention to soldiers dying, you have "an agenda"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:18 AM
Original message
If you really want someone to feel it ...
...suggest they do this:

Watch a clock tick off each second for 33 minutes and 20 seconds.

Each tick represents one US soldier dead in Iraq the past 30 months.

Sit and watch 2000 ticks of a clock, and appreciate how many have died for this bunch of liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Time for Amurika
to pull it's head out of it's ass. And I don't know of any other people who can be so pissed, when they realize just how badly they have been USED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Right. It's not a milestone.
It's just a number. Like ZERO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hey jarhead, it was specific agendas and ulterior motives
that are the reason these 2000 are dead. And if agendas and ulterior motives are not applied posthaste, you will be saying the same thing when the "artifical mark" gets to 20,000, 30,000, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Reporting a statistic is unpatriotic. nt geesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. It is only soldiers, only sons and daughters, husbands, fathers
They are not significant to the bu$h regime or the military leaders.
The spin these creeps put on anything is sick, just sick!

Bring them home now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. the stats might be lower if there was more body armor
and less talk coming out of the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. They died for record Oil profits.
And short term Bush struts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BRLIB Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. And the "reporters" are eating it up! Any talking points to
support the bush crime family!

I just heard that line on ABC Radio "News", which interrupts Air America here every half hour.

Ann Compton seriously is a worthless brown-nosed bush bootlicker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. Email response from repuke why I asked why 2K?
For WHAT ???? Look at the photo on the front page of today's Plain Dealer. See those Iraqis with the ink-stained finger tips giving the victory sign ? THAT'S why we gave our lives, so others could have the same freedoms we enjoy and to protect those freedoms here in the homeland. Freedom is never free but is usually worth the price that is paid. In 2003, over 17,000 American lives were lost in this country as a result of alcohol-related traffic accidents - 17,000 American lives lost in just ONE year due to our love of BOOZE (Source - MADD statistics on their website) !!!! Now THAT is truly a senseless loss of life - WHERE is your OUTRAGE ???? 2,000 American lives lost in 3 years to protect and promote freedom versus 17,000 American lives lost in ONE year (2003) for the love of booze ! Your sense of sorrow for the loss of American lives is admirable, but if the senseless loss of American lives is truly the driver of your outrage, then your outrage is sadly misdirected. Or is the life of a soldier somehow worth more than the life of an innocent run down by a drunk driver ?



All he could do was change the subject to something other than the lives lost in a illegal war. Implying that I wasn't outraged over drunk driving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. The reason for the invasion was not "Freedom for Iraq"
(As stated in the article.) It was Saddam's WMD's. Most of us knew it was bogus, but that WAS the official excuse. And today's top story emphasizes that WMD were a cynical lie.

Since 2000 is only a "mark on the wall"--how long will that wall be?

One excuse I heard this AM: Some of the deaths were accidents or suicide. Hey, the percentage of suicides in Iraq was not much higher than the percentage in the US!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC