Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:35 AM
Original message |
"charges of perjury and obstruction of justice"-and-OUTING A COVERT AGENT! |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 11:38 AM by Roland99
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Prosecutor_in_leak_case_seeks_indictments_1026.htmlFitzgerald has also asked the jury to indict Libby on a second charge: knowingly outing a covert operative, the lawyers said. They said the prosecutor believes that Libby violated a 1982 law that made it illegal to unmask an undercover CIA agent. :woohoo:
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |
1. reread it - Libby for knowingly outing a covert operative) |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 11:38 AM by emulatorloo
<snip>
Fitzgerald has also asked the jury to indict Libby on a second charge: knowingly outing a covert operative, the lawyers said. They said the prosecutor believes that Libby violated a 1982 law that made it illegal to unmask an undercover CIA agent.
<snip>
|
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yeah...saw that...edited to reflect that paragraph! |
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. and still rumor at this point, although it sounds credible. ROVE = IDIOT |
|
He outta take the deal. Guess he still thinks he is smarter than Fitz.
|
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message |
2. it mentions Libby with the "insidious of traitors" law |
montana500
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
If they can get Libby on that 1982 law, they can get him to squeal on Cheney/Bush. WOW. This thing may get extended.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
5. The treason bit was always a massive reach. |
|
As for the espionage act, prosecutors are expected to go with the law that best fits the crime. Besides, he doesn't have to be done investigating yet. If he has the goods for the 1982 law and perjury and obstruction of justice, then he goes with that, for now.
This is not the end of the world.
|
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
7. If true, Fitzgerald has evidence that Libby actually knew she was |
|
covert. Which we knew he knew, but now we know he knows. Know what I mean.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Well, covert is the plain word we use, not the language of the law. |
|
The law says, someone whose identity the US is taking active measures to conceal. That's broader and less easy to sneak around than the word "covert". There's plenty of room to nail an official with rightful national security clearance to know that Plame's ID was being protected by the government (not just the CIA, *THE GOVERNMENT*) who releases her identity anyway.
And Fitz knows all that and must have enough to get Libby on this.
|
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Is this no longer a known unknown? |
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. It is now an unknown known. |
|
In other words, we know the goods exist, we just don't know exactly what they are.
Upside: Neither does Libby.
|
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. When will then be now? |
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Email Pat via his record company & show him some LOVE: |
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
13. You have to wonder if they were going to just charge him with |
|
perjury and the like - until Repukes made a big stinck about "the original crime".
Now it looks like Libby could be facing more time.
|
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. CNN with Wolf Blitzer was good. Larry Johnson was on. |
|
Wolf looked like he wanted to be a million miles away!!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |