Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rasmussen Has Bush Hitting All-Time Low Approval 41% to 59% Disapproval

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 04:55 PM
Original message
Rasmussen Has Bush Hitting All-Time Low Approval 41% to 59% Disapproval
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 04:56 PM by louis c
An amazing number.

I follow Rasmussen 3-day tracking every day. Bush has never been this low. His strongly disapprove number of 44% is all time high, and is 3 points higher than President Asshole's combined approval (22% strongly approve and 19% somewhat approve).

53% of Americans now say bringing the troops home is more important than finishing the mission in that country. This is the first time that a majority of Americans have held that view.

All of this is BEFORE the shit hits the fan.

If his numbers are this bad with Scotty, watch out below.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's because he is a bad president.
But you can't hold it against him that he sucks because that's un-american. We must worship mediocrity because mediocrity is the Republicans' true religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Numbers are about the same today 41% to 58%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. and 0% undecided
Sounds like more and more people are paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. kick again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. It doesn't list the response rate, just the sample size and MOE. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nixon lasted a year after getting this low
Clinton had numbers that were "kind of this crappy" in 1993 and 1994.
www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/nixon-clinton-bush.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC