Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Shrum Helps Chris Matthews Peddle Pro-Bush Talking Points

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Presstitutes Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:47 PM
Original message
Bob Shrum Helps Chris Matthews Peddle Pro-Bush Talking Points
http://www.presstitutes.com/presstitutes/2005/10/bob_shrum_helps.html

A couple of days ago we wrote that "one of the ways reporters intentionally or unintentionally support Bush is by repeating long-standing fictional narratives about him. One of the great strategic failures of Democrats is not to appreciate the power of this kind of repetition by the traditional media. "Flip-flop" didn't get attached to John Kerry because Republicans called Kerry a flip-flopper. It was the insidious insertion of the meme into the national bloodstream by 'legitimate' reporters (otherwise known as Pre$$titutes), whose relationship of trust with the public allows them to shape views more readily than partisans like Fox, etc. If Pre$$titutes didn't reinforce rightwing talking points, those talking points would be far less ubiquitous."

As if to prove our point about Democrats not getting it, Bob Shrum appeared on Hardball (10/26) and engaged in this exchange with Chris Matthews... MATTHEWS: Bush is capable of "such grand, grand moments." SHRUM (agreeing): Bush led the nation "in such a brilliant way" after the 9/11 attacks.

You might ask yourself why a senior Democratic strategist would repeat a fictional narrative designed to bolster Bush's image. One answer is that many establishment Democrats - amazingly - don't understand the centrality of Pre$$titute-driven storylines when it comes to shaping favorable impressions of Bush. If they did, they wouldn't glibly parrot those storylines.

And speaking of Democrats being chronically incapable of understanding the new communications landscape, read Arianna Huffington's latest: "With Plamegate dominating the day, the table is set for the Democratic Party to seize the moment. The scandal has reignited a national debate about the White House lies and deceptions that led us to war in Iraq, public support for the president’s handling of the war has hit an all-time low, and the 2,000th soldier killed in action has put the human cost of the war back on page one. So how have the Democrats reacted? You be the grand jury (Warning: have some Xanax or other suitable anti-depressant handy)..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I doubt any amount of spin...
...will save Bush and Co. from the Grand Jury. It's a complete waste of time. This isn't a political campaign, it's a legal process. They'd better come to grips with that fact real fast. Of course, I'll also be pleased if they don't! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I turned it off the moment I heard Shrum say that BS about *'s leadershit
why to they feel they have to DO that?

to seem nonpartisan, or what?

did pugs EVER say anything positive about WJC....ANYthing?

and to sit there, and NOT contravene the LIES being spewed by their counterparts, and to be apparently ignorant about the addendum to the Senate Intel Committee's report, AFA Wilson's Niger trip is beyond pathetic

bleeaaahhhh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bob Shrum is a Republican mole. He's lost 8 straight Presdential
elections for the Dems, so he's just doing what he's paid to do.

Tweety likes to have him on: it cements the meme of Democrats as losers. That's also why Shrum likes to BE on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of course Shrum is anxious to agree
the Shrubbery was "brilliant". Inflating Bush into a formidable pol gets him off the hook for his 8th lost presidential race. The Kerry campaign paid him $5 million for the privelege of adding to his unbroken streak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJackFlash Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yep, it's awfully disheartening
How despicably spineless the Dems appear. Our "best and brightest" just met in LA and came up with the slogan, “America Can Do Better” ... oh, brother. They could have asked us at DU to come up with a better slogan than that. Bob Shrum PLEASE GO AWAY! DNC, for the love of God, STOP PAYING BOB SHRUM!!
At least we're rid of those worthless invertebrates Gephardt and Daschle.
Bartcop has been railing against our pink-tutu "leadership" for years.
http://www.bartcop.com/

I'm perfectly willing to play realpolitik and understand that sometimes it's necessary to move to the middle, but the party leadership just doesn't get it, that they don't have to repeat konservative talking points - they need to show and articulate real convictions. The last several years the only things they've shown they're good at are avoiding offending the fascist republikans, rolling over for Dear Leader, and losing elections.
Sadly, Arianna's last line put it very well: When it comes to having an opposition party willing to actually be in opposition, “America Can Do Better”.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaz4jazz Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bob Schrum was Bush speechifier
He worked for Bush writing speeches including the 9/11 speech. ANother cool aid server/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That was David Frum
Shrum's a worthless shit, but he's a Democratic worthless shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC