A CIA report casts new doubt on links between Iraq and Al Qaeda.

[ECH1969]

Oct. 26, 2005 - A secret draft CIA report raises new questions about a principal argument used by the Bush administration to justify the war in Iraq: the claim that Saddam Hussein was "harboring" notorious terror leader Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi prior to the American invasion.

The allegation that Zarqawi had visited Baghdad in May 2002 with Saddam's sanction—purportedly for medical treatment—was once a centerpiece of the administration's arguments about Iraq. Secretary of State Colin Powell cited Zarqawi's alleged visit in his speech to the United Nations Security Council.

The CIA declined to comment on the draft report. But officials tell NEWSWEEK that Zarqawi probably did travel to the Iraqi capital in the spring of 2002 for medical treatment.

But before the American-led invasion, Saddam's government may never have known he was there. The reason: he used an alias and was there under what one U.S. intelligence official calls a "false cover."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9831216/site/newsweek/

[seattlemetal]

1. I'm shocked. really.

[stillcool]

2. isn't that horse dead yet? n/t

[mmonk]

3. no sh*t?

[LynnTheDem]

4. -Zarqawi is not, never was, "al Qaeda.

-He was Ansar al Islam, in US-protected Kurdistan.

-3 times the US military told bush they had a "window of oportunity" to take Zaraqwi out; 3 times bush said no...it would take away his lies of Iraq-al Qaeda ties.

-The 911 hijackers lived in the USA and even graduated from US universities. The FBI and CIA were keeping tabs on several of them. "America harbors al Qaeda!" :eyes:

[Wilms]

6. No matter.

They hate us for our "_________".

[mmonk]

7. Yes, Ansar al Islam was protected

in a way by U.S. air cover.

[lavendermist]

5. Wow...

I am astounded at this information. Shocked, I tell you. Shocked.
Not!