Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miers withdrawing is about Plamegate!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:41 AM
Original message
Miers withdrawing is about Plamegate!
Here is my theory.....

In the yahoo story covering the Miers withdrawing her name - she stated that she was convinced that senators would continue to push hard for internal white house documents about her counsel to the president. And she remains counsel to Bush.
What if there was sensitive internal documents pertaining to plamegate that she does not want to go public? Maybe some counseling she gave Bush in this regard that might indicate he had a much more active role in Plame's outing than any one had initially thought.....

Think I am nuts? Oh well - a walk with tinfoil on head is fun sometimes.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I Don't Know if That's It, but
This is a tremendous blow to Bush, so there has to be some very extenuating circumstances for this to have happened. Your reason sounds as plausible as any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Blow to Bush???
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 10:14 AM by Leopolds Ghost
He ordered her to get out. He sacrificed her like a chess piece. Rove ordered him to do it and if I were Rove I would've counseled the same thing. Now they will find someone ultra conservative for the Dems to Bork and sacrifice him/her so they can demonize the Dems (and quietly strangle Fitzmas by quietly resigning) instead of splitting apart their own base forcing Rove to go in fact, not just in theory, allowing Fitzmas to fester for the Republicans.

With a unified GOP spin control machine back in operation, executing drills it's been preparing for for decades, for the Republicans this is the equivalent to WWII jumpstarting the economy after the Depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. You Know That
And I know that. But the average Repug thinks Bush is god and this will be looked at as a failure by him. The average repug doesn't understand the dynamics going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Mind you, I'm
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 01:12 PM by Leopolds Ghost
I'm not saying this was planned all along. I think that's unrealistic. Bush merely slipped his noose and cut a deal with Harry Ried while Rove was preoccupied.

I wonder if Ried sold Bush any sightseeing guides while he was at it -- perhaps offered to tell Bush where he got his shoes -- before Rove dragged him away from the scene of the crime. ;-)

"But Unca Rove, he offered to play three-card monte with me!!"

"Enough! Uncle Rove is very angry, George. Uncle Rove has enough on his plate. I told you to go straight to the Federalist Society and pick up a judge -- no talking with strange Democrats on your way back from the store! Don't make me come back there!"

On edit: That said, having made the decision, Rove regarded Miers as expendable. Dems were smart not to flush themselves out against a weak nominee, and call their own bluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think more likely Bush* didn't want the lotto dealings to come out
The Senate committee had already indicated an intent to call the guy she fired, over the crony payoff to Ben Barne's company (quid pro quo, apparently to keep him silent on Bush's Nat. Guard "issues.."

I think this and other little corruption tidbits from Bush's governship were going to come out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ed murrow Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Plamegate
Pretty interesting theory

I think she definitely could not handle the scrutiny

Third rail is when the snears turn to genuine laughter...people were laughing at the Miers nomination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Yes, and now with Meiers gone, the facts won't ever come out.
Gosh, what a huge blow this is for Bush! :rolleyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, but B** made the decision yesterday not to allow the release
of any documents. This, I believe, was his set up, his way out. What I don't get is why did he nominate her to begin with? Because Reid and Leahy pre-approved her? Even if that were true, he (or rather the people who think for him) would have had to know that she would have no paper trail to substantiate her as a choice. Hell, maybe it was just plain stupid. Maybe he said, "He he he, can I make the choice, please, can I? "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Isn't if funny. Repugnuts demand documents, * withdraws nomination.
Dems demand documents, Bolton gets recessed. Someone put this in their file. Something tells me we could use it later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Mister Fitz, subpeona that woman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. The timing is all about politics
It diverts attention away from the indictments coming, Look for a replacement named on Monday. It's soooo obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I think so too
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 09:04 AM by FreedomAngel82
He had to find some reason to get the talking heads away from the indictments so I wonder if Karl told him he should withdraw her name. Now all the networks are talking about this. Plus he still has all his secrets from his national guard days (lack thereof) to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think everyone knew that Miers would be toast if Rove got indicted.
My guess is they decided to do it before, instead of after.

I know now that Rove is getting indicted tomorrow, because of this action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't know if she would keep records of that
:shrug: But there's all types of secrets that they could've found out. From 9/11 to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sounds good to me, lets get it in print and get it out, then move on

if he keeps trying this he'll bruise what little bit of brain he has left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC