Soldiers’ moms not stooges
In response to “More ‘Calvin,’ less Cindy” (letter, Oct. 16), I can only be glad my mother does not subscribe to Stars and Stripes.
How anyone, and especially a field grade commissioned officer, can feel comfortable calling the grieving mother of a fallen American soldier a “stooge” for a political party is beyond me. I’m not even sure if the writer is complaining about Stars and Stripes’ comic section, U.S. soldiers who happen to think Cindy Sheehan is right, the Democratic Party in general, or Americans who write books about the war in Iraq.
Not everyone who serves in the military with one eye toward fringe benefits is dishonest. After all, the writer’s salary with housing benefits is probably over $75,000 annually, which is triple what many American police officers, firefighters and young enlisted soldiers are paid.
Young people often do not realize they could die serving in the military. That naiveté does not make them criminals. It simply heightens the responsibility of leaders to do everything possible to improve their safety. This Army is nearly 50,000 soldiers short and losing ground every day. Criticizing the parents of our dead is not helping recruitment.
Sheehan is a mother whose child was killed
. No one, not even the other 1,970 or more mothers out there, has the right to criticize her. I’ve not heard a single statement from her that has tarnished her son’s memory or his sacrifice. She has been critical of the Army and our president, which is her right. I’ve also not seen her acting as a glory grabber. If Sheehan does write a book about her experiences, the writer does not have to buy it. If anyone is bad-mouthing her son, I’m sorry to say it is another Army officer.
First Lt. William Luke
Forward Operating Base Speicher, Iraq
http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=125&article=32565