soon its going to be easier to list the republicans who arent criminals

[oregonindy]

rather than the ones who are.

[YDogg]

1. I think you mean "indicted crimnals".

I'm just sayin'.

[applegrove]

2. Like JS said on the Daily Show - Bush has a problem with every

TOM, DICK & HARRIET!!!

[Doubting Thomas]

3. It's always been easier

to list the republicans who aren't criminals!

:rofl:

[newyawker99]

5. Hi Doubting Thomas!!

Welcome to DU!! :toast:

[Doubting Thomas]

6. Thanks for the welcome

I've been lurking for a while, and just had to comment on that one.

BTW, are you a real Nu Yawker? I was born in Brooklyn, raised in Astoria, lived 30 years in So. CA after the service and moved to PA in 1998. With any luck, I'll be back on the "Best Coast" by next summer.

[izzie]

4. I does seem to be a spin off of the ones in power

I think it is the money. There is so much it is hard to keep your hands off the stuff. Both parties are bad at it once they have been in power for a while. I still like Congress to have both parties in power. Then we as voters have a little more power. I know that slows down things but that I see as good and not bad.

[Enraged_Ape]

7. There are Republicans who aren't criminals?

A few years ago, I might have suggested Jim Jeffords, but then he switched to Independent. So now I'm :shrug: