Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woodward on Larry King Live..."Plamegate is innocent gossip with NO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:24 PM
Original message
Woodward on Larry King Live..."Plamegate is innocent gossip with NO
underlying crime." What a fool.

Innocent gossip, pursued by an overzealous prosecutor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's a shit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:27 PM
Original message
Didn't you tell me before...
That Woodward was part of a group of far right Republicans that wanted to bring Nixon down because he was too liberal?

I guess Woody probably loved Reagan, and now Bush Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. He has told
one of my relatives that Judith Miller is a hero. I think that one needs to belong to a very narrow group to believe that today.

Nixon was indeed brought down by the republican right. Woodward was, of course, working with Mark Felt, a very right-wing fellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Interesting. Well for a party that only MOUTHS ethics and morality,
I guess a few of them have to make a pretense of it! This is the most crooked administration that I thought possible. For Woodward to make statements to the contrary, while posing as a 'noble historian' makes me ill. Let him admire Miller. Few do anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. He just said Miller is an underdog and he's for the underdog.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Woodward's analysis is amazing ain't it?
He's for the underdog.

Fucking idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
53. At this point the American people are the underdogs. And we're not in
Woodward's or Miller's social circuit. No doubt Woodward also will champion Rove an underdog as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_spectator Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
71. Judy's an "underdog"???
MUST ... RESTRAIN ... (COUGH ugly'ho COUGH) ... SELF!!!
NOT ... MAKE ... JOKE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
87. Perhaps that group is Operation Mockingbird Alumni.
Maybe they have a club. We know they have their own code words. Perhaps they consider themselves like aspens, connected at their roots.

Maybe they have secret handshakes.

Maybe, when they are on their deathbeds, they'll finally grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #87
96. I think there's alot of truth in what you say. Mockingbird Alumni.
It explains alot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #96
99. He was USN intel, FWIW nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #99
101. Correct.
As had MF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
94. Nixon's sin was he made peace with Red China.
The Reich needs its enemies to keep control of the war economy and to control the masses through fear.

Same happened to Pruneface Reagan. The guy goes and makes pals with Gorby at Reykjavik and says, "Let's get rid of the nukes." A few days later, the Sandinistas rocket Hasenfus's CIA plane out of the Nicaraguan sky and Reagan's on his way to what should have been impeachment.

Who'd have benefited both times? The Poppy Bush War Party and Population Reducing wing of the Reich. That's BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
89. That is certainly what I believe. It fits what he was then with what he is
now better than sell-out, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
91. Woodwards a major turd of the BFEE.
The guy told Larry King, the rest of the panel and millions watching on TV that the CIA had done an analysis of the impact of the Plame outting. He said that there had been some minor problems, but that there were no major losses to national security. What bullshit. What's worse, the rest of the panel just listened and went on their business without challenging him.

Remember, the lawyers for Judy Miller and the other recalcitrant presstitutes tried to prevent the testimony before the Grand Jury. When Fitzgerald showed a judge what the CIA had found, the judge said the report indicated the Plame and Brewster Jennings outtings meant a major loss to national security.



 "No damage?" Try telling it to the pros

Two former CIA officers seem to have a little bit of difficulty swallowing the wingnut line that the revelation of Valerie Plame's connection with the CIA didn't damage the national security:

Here's James Marchinowski:

What is important now is not who wins or loses the political battle or who may or may not be indicted; rather, it is a question of how we will go about protecting the citizens of this country in a very dangerous world. The undisputed fact is that we have irreparably damaged our capability to collect human intelligence and thereby significantly diminished our capability to protect the American people.

Understandable to all Americans is a simple, incontrovertible, but damning truth: the United States government exposed the identity of a clandestine officer working for the CIA. This is not just another partisan "dust-up" between political parties. This unprecedented act will have far-reaching consequences for covert operations around the world. Equally disastrous is that from the time of that first damning act, we have continued on a course of self-inflicted wounds by government officials who have refused to take any responsibility, have played hide-and-seek with the truth and engaged in semantic parlor games for more than two years, all at the expense of the safety of the American people. No government official has that right.

For an understanding of what is at stake it is important to understand some fundamental principles. No country or hostile group, from al Qaeda to any drug rings operating in our cities, likes to be infiltrated or spied upon. The CIA, much like any police department in any city, has undercover officers--spies, that use "cover."

SNIP...

And here's Larry Johnson:

I'm Larry Johnson, an American, a registered Republican, a former intelligence official at the CIA, and a friend of Valerie Plame.

SNIP...

I am stunned that government officials at the highest level have such ignorance about a matter so basic to the national security structure of this nation.

Robert Novak's compromise of Valerie led to scrutiny of CIA officers that worked with her. This not only compromised her "cover" company but potentially every individual overseas who had been in contact with that company or with her.

We must put to bed the lie that she was not undercover.

CONTINUED...

http://www.markarkleiman.com/archives/valerie_plame_/2005/07/no_damage_try_telling_it_to_the_pros.php



Bush is a Traitor.

So are those in the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #91
100. True.
Symbolman's DVD "Rove's War" has a number of interesting clips of intelligence people explaining what damage it did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Translation:
"Watergate was way more important, therefore, I (Woodward) am more important. Really! I'm friggin' immortal and stuff!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. And

"I still have more notebooks from that time period to transcribe into books."

Can't cash in all the chips at once, have to space those books out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Exactly. What an arrongant A...hole. He also stated that the original
report by Wilson was "ambiguous." So what? Even if it was, is that an excuse for outing a CIA agent? The Republicans have been more condemning of BFEE than Woodward was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. that's close to what his editors told him when he was oh, 27 y.o.
and pursuing an apparently aimless third-rate burglary....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Only one Democrat on the panel
That figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yes, this LIBERAL press. Don't you love it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. 'Plonker'
how much was he paid to say that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. surprised he was able to crawl out of *'s butt long enough
to go on TV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gossip??? with Secret documents and CIA operatives???
Iraq war lies gossip!!!

They just are looking terrible right now!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. As in Bob Woodward?
What, is he jealous that there's a new Watergate that someone else is investigating while he ignores it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Yes, as in Bob Woodward. And you might be right about jealousy, but
I also think that he realizes that a lot of his "history" on the BFEE is going to be tainted forever! That would explain his stupidity in making these remarks that are not substantiated at all by known facts.

He was the first to push the Tenet comment "It's a slam dunk"...and he kept repeating it like a parrot with a mantra. I think he set Tenet up somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
46. Woodward knows who's been buttering his bread all these years.
Know any other big wheel reporter who's had such access to the GW's White House while working on a book about Bush's WH? Why is that?

He's the insiders' hagiographer. He writes what becomes the official story.

One imagines if Seymour Hersh even got near the front gates they'd arrest him. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. Oh, you're probably right about Seymour!. Sad and funny! ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow. What happened to him? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readermostly Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
82. It seems, to me anyway, that Woodward has been in the RW camp
for quite some time now. His opinions don't seem unbiased, but partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. why isn't Bernstein ever on??? of course, he's not a shill for W
and maybe too Jewish and liberal????? for modern day M$M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. Bernstein was on Rita Cosby's show blasting the Bushistas and then
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 09:32 PM by oasis
got into a tangle with G. Gordon Liddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. I love every interview that I've heard Bernstein give. The problem is
that they are usually together, and Woodward always hogs the conversation. And yes, he is too liberal. He speaks the truth! There's a wonderful quote by Bill Moyers with respect to Liberals, truth and the media. I looked for it and can't find it currently. To paraphrase 'The more we speak the truth, the more they label us as 'liberals' because they hate the truth.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Apparently, Carl Bernstein disagrees....what he said tonight on Cosby
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 08:33 PM by Gloria
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
44. Oh, thanks so much for that link. I usually avoid Cosby, but would have
watched her instead of this crapola. I am angry at Larry King over this (not the first time)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #44
74. There may be a repeat. Check your local listing. Liddy really comes off
looking like a dunce.:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #74
98. Compare Bernstein's remarks: "We might be watching the beginning
of an implosion of this administration." "This was clearly a cover-up for the pretense for war." "Very serious questions are being raised about the competency"...etc., etc. Bernstein calls it for what it is. Criminal Cover-up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Watergate was just a harmless prank...
nothing we should have been concerned with.

He's going senile obviously, poor guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. What's really funny is that Berstein is on MSNBC saying the opposite!
Carl said this is a coverup, without question. It's similar to Watergate, in that the coverup is much worse than the underlying crime!

I never listen to that scratchy voiced Rita Cosby, but the TV was on and it was an interesting combat between G. Gordon Liddy and Carl Bernstein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Woodward is sell-out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Larry King
I don't even consider Larry King to be a news show anymore. Mostly it seems like just another entertainment gossip show........

Yeah, right! Like we really need another one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
59. Woodward was disgusting till the end...

...Hiya tulsakatz. I don't watch LKL but saw them all there while surfing and decided to watch....mistake. I hope the jury hands down about 10 indictments. He will be back on tomorrow night so it will be interesting to watch him eat crow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #59
69. God let's hope so! I love to watch hypocrites and liars eat crow...
(or something worse, like.... for those of you that saw Keith Olbermann tonight!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #69
73. I wouldn't miss KO...
I had stopped watching Hardball but heard he has been hitting Bushco hard. He must rue the day he voted for him and there must be many just like him who feel betrayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. Look up Sellout in the dictionary, and you'll see this shill's face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. You've got THAT right. How does one switch the Google to list
Woodward when you google sellout? I'ld love to be able to do that. (Like typing in 'Failure' and the Google response is Bush?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrin_73 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. How did this guy ever cover the watergate?
it beats me. Was he always like this or did he make a turn to the dark side?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
60. Woodward had the Watergate story handed to him. Remember Deep Throat?
Without him.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. Woodward is essentially part of this White House. He was inside
during the first term writing his book and he is back on the inside writing a book on the second term.

To me, he is another WH insider.

It is soooo very disappointing how he has turned out.

Bernstein is completely opposite of him on BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoopnyc Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. He's quite frankly disgusting! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. BOB WOODWARD NEEDS HIS SECURITY CLEARANCE REVOKED
IMMEDIATELY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. David Gergen wasn't letting him get away with it.
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 08:40 PM by SeattleGirl
Did you see that exchange? Woodward trying to blow this off, it's just gossip, not about the war, etc. And Gergen got right in his face about it, and asked him how he could even think it wasn't about the war. Hehe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I like Gergen.
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 08:44 PM by Lex
Sometimes he REALLY ticks me off (he sometimes gives the White House too much of the benefit of the doubt), but overall Gergen calls 'em like he sees 'em.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I agree.
On occasion, he leaves his brain at home, but essentially he's a straight shooter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #32
86. Gergen is great!
He has been around, and he expresses himself very eloquently. He has always been good. I remember my mother's watching him on McNeil Lehrer for many years. When my children were toddlers (now 23 and 24),they used to imitate the way he talked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. Oh please tell me he didn't really say that!
Why is it that we need to educate people in this country on the seriousness of outing a covert CIA operative with unofficial cover? Do people not even realize how that damages our national security?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
66. He is educated and must know what's going on. He is participating in
the cover-up as well, of all ironies! He has to protect his flattering non-history book on the BFEE, though. Lies, to cover-up lies, to cover-up lies...sounds like Watergate, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Sounds very much like Watergate. But I think it's worst...
We are talking about treason of the highest order here.

We are talking about damage to our national security. Damage done by an Administration that claimed just last year they were the only ones who could keep us safe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. I agree its worse than Watergate. The only ones who could keep us
safe, protect our freedom(s), unite us and, of course, the real clincher, 'the moral ones'...GAG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. Woodward is an ignorant prick with NO underlying redeeming value
fob
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
85. and he looks like a zombie.
not that there's anything wrong with that, just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. Link to the Yale Daily News article on the lecture Woodward gave Tuesday:
http://www.yaledailynews.com/article.asp?AID=30516

The article says he told the students that the media's "job to get our finger in the eye of the government" and that journalists exist "to get to the bottom of things."

But he also bragged about how Bush gave him the longest interview ever given by a sitting president on a single topic ("bragged" is my interpretation, not the article's).


From his experience during that interview, in addition to his other contact with the president, Woodward said he thinks Bush has two defining characteristics.

"At the spine of George W. Bush … is the duty and zeal to free people," Woodward said.

<snip>

"I was most impressed by his personal anecdotes from his interview with Bush and the respect that he showed for Bush's directness and simplicity," Sam Slavin '08 said. "He left open the possibility that his dedication to humanitarian good in Iraq is genuine, an opinion that I haven't heard very often from the liberal media."

<snip>

But other students said they wished Woodward had gone into greater depth about his opinions on the current administration.



The rest of the article explains that Woodward avoided a lot of questions, the more political ones.

Sounds like those in the audience who weren't conservatives were understandably skeptical of Woodward's attitude toward the Bush administration, despite the platitudes about journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
75. Thanks so much for the link, but I almost lost dinner reading just snips
of it. What an obvious WH shrill, What a Judy Miller, What a liar!

duty and zeal to free people

his dedication to humanitarian good in Iraq is genuine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. The same Woodward that framed the WMD lies as Tenet's fault...
What a surprise! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
78. I thought this was the case! Woodward's mantra for months
"It's a slam dunk.."

I can still hear him saying this with his peculiar drawl, and I knew he was lying when he said it. A gut reaction. I haven't trusted him since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. Well, that supports my feelings from his appearance on the Daily Show.
bye bye Bob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. Lindsay Graham refuses to be involved in that conversation. He sits
there and looks straight ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
42. He's still bullshitting:
"maybe you did something that was not illegal but embarrassing and you forgot about it, that would lead to the perjury charges...."

At least there is still Bernstein to look up too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. WHAT!!!????
How does that bastard know that there was no collateral damage from the outing!! He basically said it was no big deal. HOW DOES HE KNOW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
43. Have either one of the panelist mentioned that it was the CIA that
instigated this investigation and not the Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Well, you see, that would entail getting into the minutia and the facts
And gee, why would they want to do that?! (insert sarcasm here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
47. These jerks are now changing their previous assessments of indictment
probabilities. I think something is amiss. A deal of some sort was struck I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
48. Woodward states unequivocally that no damage was done to the CIA
by Plame's outing.

:wtf:

Woodward has access to CIA internal docs like that?

Or is he just LYING for the WHITE HOUSE?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. He's parroting the rethug lie.
His "source".... who is it, Bob?

Woodward is a total rethug hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
57. Lying for the White House, of course.
I'd rather hear what former cia agent Larry Johnson or Joe Wilson has to say about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #48
62. Didn't Larry Johnson say just the opposite yesterday
On Wolf Blitzer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
93. Wayne Madsen reported CIA's damage assesment was "devastating."
Valerie Plame, Brewster Jennings & Associates and their entire network were compromised. Everybody the came in contact with overseas -- but everybody -- got rolled up. All their work to stop the spread of nukes got tossed.

Gee. Who benefits the most from that? The Bush coalition of fascists, maybe?

Woodward infuriated me. His words indicate where his wallet and patriotism lie.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
49. Woodward says no damage was done by Plame outing...
no harm, no foul.

This makes me sick to my stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. How would he possibly have access to internal CIA docs
outlining such a thing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. The opposite was said by two intelligence experts Wolf Blitzer had
on The Situation Room today. They both stressed the great damage to the future credibility of US intelligence, how the Plame outing would make people whose cooperation and trust our intelligence agencies need believe they can't trust us.

Wolf tried to counter their arguments, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:00 PM
Original message
I would love to put Woodard
in a room with Larry Johnson and close the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
50. TREASON Mr. Woodward. Can you say it? ......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
52. Woodward's become an embarrassment to journalism.
Not that he doesn't have a lot of company with all the other media whores. But still, how sickening...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
61. One telling note on Woodward...
When Larry went around the table asking how many indictments he said he doesn't know. If he was so certain, no one had any intent to do anything wrong then he would have said zero indictments but the twerp didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaytonOHDem Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
63. I am sorry but this is the second time tonight that I have to say,
Oh my God. Woodward and Bernstein have been my journalistic heroes. The last five years I have been thinking, if only we had journalists like Woodward and Bernstein. I guess I will have to limit that to Bernstein now. All the Presidents Men is one of my favorite movies. It just won't be the same anymore now that I know Woodward has gone over to the dark side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. They can still be your heroes, if you confine it to the Watergate era.
Bernstein is still okay, but yeah, Woodward has gone over to the dark side, or just over the edge! But I think the two of them are still to be very much admired for the work they did on Watergate, and however they are in the present, it doesn't take away from their prior work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #63
79. I know exactly how you feel, and it is sad. Especially since he is
participating in lies and cover-ups for this White House, when his very claim to fame is the opposite! One wonders about Bush #1 's involvement in Nixon's outing for personal political gain, and Woodward's possible role. Some think GHWB was involved in Reagan's assassination attempt because of all the very peculiar Hinckley ties. The vileness of these people goes back decades. Maybe Woodward was really one of them long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #63
83. I feel your pain...
...and it's heartbreaking isn't it?

"All The President's Men" is one of my favorite movies because it demonstrates how a person of integrity and perseverance can overcome big, powerful criminals in the government.

The idea of "Woodward and Bernstein" just warms the heart, because it gives us hope that the good guys do win, and that the bad guys will be exposed.

Now that "Woodward" is a BushCo apologist and self-serving sycophant--it's a loss of that dream--and of the hope--that good can overcome evil in politics.

The sad thing is--there are no "Woodwards" or "Bernsteins" in the MSM. They're all too afraid or too busy ass-kissing their way to the top of the media food chain--which is owned by corporate America. No real journalists, and now one of the giants of journalists appears to be just a memory gone bad.

Really disheartening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidnightWind Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
64. He's the Washington Post's version of Judy Miller
an embarassment to journalism and to the Post. Another Bush apologist extraordinare just like Miller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. and he has security clearance just like Judy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
68. Woodward is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
76. a brief excerpt from "Silent Coup"
"Silent Coup: The Removal of a President"

Len Colodny and Robert Getlin

about his days at Yale - "His conservative stance may have set him apart;

after hearing Woodward speak in class one day, a political science

professor called him a 'crypto-fascist.' "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #76
81. Whoa, that's an accurate description of him today ...apparently it doesn't
wear off. It's oddly reminiscent of another political science professor's remark about young Georgie! What is this book about? Which President? Nixon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. yes nixon and watergate
find a copy of "Secret Agenda: Watergate, Deep Throat and the CIA"

by Jim Hougan

and then read "Silent Coup"





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #84
92. GHWB and the CIA, and his potential role in Reagan's attempted
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 10:42 PM by WiseButAngrySara
assassination (ties to Hinckley family, Catcher in the Rye Bush#1's favorite book BTW...) Does the book cover any of this? I wonder if Woodward has been a BFEE pawn for much longer than we might expect. Boy am I becoming a tinfoiler!

Edited to add my comment from post #79 above:

One wonders about Bush #1 's involvement in Nixon's outing for personal political gain, and Woodward's possible role. Some think GHWB was involved in Reagan's assassination attempt because of all the very peculiar Hinckley ties. The vileness of these people goes back decades. Maybe Woodward was really one of them long ago.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
77. I thought my head would explode
when he said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. Same here! So I 'exploded ' on DU instead! ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
88. Wow. I think I'll go puke now.
I know he's a republican, but man, I thought he had some integrity left.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
90. He's lost his balls in the last thirty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
95. woodward, woodward? wasn't he the guy
paid by the bfee to set up Nixon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
97. Tell that to Larry Johnson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC