itzamirakul
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-27-05 09:52 PM
Original message |
Rove will NOT be indicted because... |
|
everyone KNOWS that Bush CANNOT run the country without Karl Rove and there is no one...ABSOLUTELY NO ONE...to take Rove's place. Even the Democrats know that the country will start spinning like a top out of control if Rove is not there to keep things moving fairly smoothly.
Bush doesn't even know how to tell time without Karl Rove.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-27-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message |
1. will you read the whole NYT story? Rove still under investigation |
|
which means either
1 he is still under investigation because there is a lot more dirt to dig up
and/or
2, he cut a deal and is squealing.
BUT IT IS ALL A RUMOR ANYWAY
|
BattyDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-27-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Somehow I don't think that's Fitzgerald's top concern. |
meisje
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-27-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
3. A longer investigation will only lead to legal mistakes by Fitz |
|
Bushco will use the mistakes to get any charges dropped
|
soleft
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-27-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. and you base this on was incompetance shown so far? |
ThumperDumper
(368 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-27-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message |