Dawgs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:29 AM
Original message |
|
What if all the leaks about Rove/Cheney/Libby being indicted were nothing more than the right giving something to the media, so that it won't be such a big deal if say, only Libby gets indicted?
I'm sure this might have already been mentioned and its probably not true, but I can't believe the Republicans wouldv'e just done nothing.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:31 AM
Response to Original message |
1. No big deal if only Libby gets indicted ? |
|
I'd say that's a pretty big story. What happens when he goes to trial? How can Dick Cheney's name not come up, since they were joined at the hip? How can a lot of other facts not come out once the trial begins?
|
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:32 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I am sure that there have been plenty of attempts at landscaping |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:33 AM
Response to Original message |
3. The indictment of Libby is the opening of the can of worms |
|
We have 3 years to destroy this administrations legacy.
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:41 AM
Response to Original message |
4. all the "leaks"? More like wild guesses and hype. |
|
Haven't seen a lot of leaks. What I've seen is a lot of unsubstantiated speculation and "predictions" -- both on the left and the right. The repubs didn't have to do anything to create overexpectations, we were perfectly capable of doing that to ourselves.
onenote
|
bklyncowgirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message |
5. If only Libby gets indicted then he's the first sitting WH official. |
|
To get indicted since the Grant Administration according to NBC news.
That's not an achievement Shrub should be proud of.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |