Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

F.B.I. Is Still Seeking Source of Forged Uranium Reports

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:50 AM
Original message
F.B.I. Is Still Seeking Source of Forged Uranium Reports
By DOUGLAS JEHL
Published: October 28, 2005

WASHINGTON, Oct. 27 - A two-year inquiry by the Federal Bureau of Investigation has yet to uncover the origin of forged documents that formed a basis for sending an envoy on a fact-finding trip to Niger, a mission that eventually exploded into the C.I.A. leak inquiry, law enforcement and intelligence officials say.

A counterespionage official said Wednesday that the inquiry into the documents, which were intended to show that Iraq was seeking uranium for a nuclear weapons program, had yielded some intriguing but unproved theories. One is the possibility that associates of Ahmad Chalabi, the former Iraqi exile who was a leading champion of the American campaign to topple Saddam Hussein, had a hand in the forgery. A second hypothesis, described by some officials as more likely, is that the documents were forged at Niger's embassy in Rome, in a moneymaking scheme. The official said the matter was being investigated as a counterintelligence case, not a criminal one.

The United States government did not receive the papers until October 2002, eight months after the Central Intelligence Agency sent Joseph C. Wilson IV, a retired ambassador, to Niger on the fact-finding mission, according to a review completed last year by the Senate intelligence committee. The C.I.A. decided in March 2003 that the papers were forgeries.

But a little-noticed passage in another government report said the C.I.A. had determined that foreign intelligence passed to the agency in the months before Mr. Wilson's trip also contained information that was "based on the forged documents and was thus itself unreliable."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/28/politics/28niger.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yesterday on Big Eddy or Al Frankin, I can't remember which
They were saying that the letterhead papers were stolen in a break in. Also mysterious is that the forged documents were hand carried to the US and did not use normal channels. I don't know where Ledeen stands in this or cheney, but it is obvious that it is some sort of Neocon Dirty Trick. The deeper story here is that GFY cheney or rummy had to cover their tracks of their illegal arms deals that Valerie and Brewster Jenning were getting close to.
Just speculating, but I'm hoping that more is uncovered.
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. An effort to delink the Plame case from the OSP-AIPAC spy case
Can you see the same news management style at work in this article as in Judy Miller's WMD reporting? Are the same editors now at work trying to cover-up the role of Michael Ledeen, Manoucher Ghorbanifar and the OSP cabal in the Niger forgeries?

This is yet another scandal in the making for the NYT, which I no longer trust as a primary source. The Times is now little more than Debka-Lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kick
:kick:
Let's not lose sight of the importance of this.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC