sabra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 07:41 AM
Original message |
NBC: Rove told he won't be indicted at this time, still under investigatio |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 07:47 AM by sabra
|
TallahasseeGrannie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 07:46 AM
Response to Original message |
zanne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 07:47 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Why do we keep getting our hopes up? |
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. What Part of STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION sounds good to you? |
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Doesn't mean he won't be indicted at a later date I guess; perhaps they are focusing on the Vice Presidents office? Bryant Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com Big Contest at blog - To potentially win a subscription to Salon Magazine, visit this post --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com/2005/10/contest-simplified-version.html
|
choie
(899 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
this could mean that Fitzgerald is going to continue to investigate him - perhaps for the leak itself or will go deeper into the bullshit that was perpetrated to get us into work... that would be a MUCH bigger deal..:grouphug:
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 07:51 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Rove is who has told all the news sources that he wont be indicted. |
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 07:57 AM
Response to Original message |
6. WHO told him this? And how the hell does he know what's |
|
in the sealed indictments? Is he suddenly Carnac? Even if he ISN'T indicted today, it's an ongoing investigation. Look at Watergate. Look what happened from one piece of tape over a door lock thingie....
|
Carni
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:02 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Why is Rove being allowed to parade around announcing this? |
|
Wouldn't he be under some type of obligation to keep his flabby ugly face shut until an announcement is made formally?
|
fearnobush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. He would and he could be ultimately full of his own turd blossom. |
|
This looks to be a classic Rove attempt to manipulate the media to steer the news coverage his way. Especially if he is indicted, he could use this B.S. as grounds to claim Fotz is out to get him personally. He could say - we made a deal and Fitz broke his promise.
|
Carni
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. I thought the same thing this AM |
|
Of course now the fat ass hasn't been indicted and I am annoyed about that but I have no doubt that he is the illustrious Mr A and I am not too sure he won't be indicted later...maybe that very fact is the reason he wasn't indicted today?
If Fitzgerald usually deals with mob types then I am sure he can manage fat lard Rove effectively!
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:11 AM
Response to Original message |
10. How is it a bad thing that he is still being investigated? |
|
I want just one DUer to actually explain this to me rather than going, "Oh shit! Rove got off free!". Good Lord people.
|
SpiralHawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. It means they have shit on him, and want to nail it tight |
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. I meant bad from the stand point of DUers. It's a good thing as far as I'm |
|
concerned. He'll be nailed with charges almost for sure if Fitz wants to continue the investigation since that probably means that he has new evidence.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |