Pacifist Patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:22 AM
Original message |
Please explain thought process. Why paper release 2 hours before |
|
news conference? I'm not a lawyer or a politician and would have probably had the news conference and then released papers. Why the other way around with a two hour gap?
I know I'm going to feel like an idiot when someone gives me the reason but I'm willing to risk it. :)
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:23 AM
Response to Original message |
1. So the intelligent can actually read the |
|
documents and ask sensible questions. Go Fitzy!!
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. sounds reasonable to me. they will be on his website right? |
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. My fingers and toes are crossed n/t |
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message |
2. He probably wants to give reporters things to ask questions about. |
justiceischeap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That the reasoning for the news conference is that there is further news to discuss besides the papers.
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Probably so he doesn't get asked a brazillion questions that can |
|
be answered with the reports.
:::getting my "Refresh" finger warmed up::::
|
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. That would be my guess. He can refer people to the documents |
|
and you can bet the documents are very carefully worded to avoid revealing anything but the essentials.
|
wishlist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
5. So there will be less misinformed speculation running rampant perhaps |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 08:25 AM by wishlist
Sounds like a great idea to issue a paper release first, then Fitz can put out his final words about the case after people have digested the report.
|
Tennessee Gal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
6. So the information can be digested.. |
|
and reported. Then Fitz can verbally give more details and/or answer any questions.
I hope, I hope he takes questions.
|
Pacifist Patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |
9. THANK YOU! Makes perfect sense now. |
|
And yes, I feel like an idiot for not thinking of that. *blush*
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Not an idiot. We're just used to the unaccountable political model, |
|
rather than the responsible apolitical model.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 02:00 AM
Response to Original message |