marbuc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 10:24 AM
Original message |
Which is worse for Rove and the WH |
|
an indictment today, or the prospect of one that could dog him for the rest of GWB's term? A lot has been said and about Rove being distracted and the WH bumbling issue after issue as a result. I'm not so sure this is the reason for GWB's meltdown, but let's assume for sake of argument that it is.
For the WH, wouldn't it be better that Karl Rove be indicted and leave now? As the opposition party, would it not be preferable for this distraction to continue?
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Continuation is WORSE by far! |
|
It's like death by 1,000 cuts!
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Continuation because there will always be that cloud over Rove's |
|
head--will he be indicted or not. Obviously Fitz is not satisfied with Rove's answers or the investigation would not continue.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Finally, we have our own distraction and it could last months! nt |
roguevalley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message |
4. indictment is finality for the accused but not knowing when is worse |
|
you can't make a plan and do something about something that hasn't come yet. its much worse to not know.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message |