Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC reading letter to Dems

[crispini]

from Office of Special Counsel saying there will be a report.

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

1. Please elaborate. n/t

[crispini]

7. That was the whole thing!

Dems asked the OSC for a report earlier, a few weeks ago. Fitz responded today. Answer was YES.

[rateyes]

2. WOOOOOO FREAKING HOOOOOOOOO!

:woohoo:

[watrwefitinfor]

19. I'll see your woo hoo and raise you one.

:woohoo: :woohoo:

What a day - never thought I'd see it.

Wat

[rateyes]

25. I call!.....

Lay the cards on the table!

:woohoo: :woohoo:

[H2O Man]

3. Huge!

This is what the country needs. Perfect.

[halobeam]

Okay.... this is nice.

hehe To you Bushco: neener, neener, neener!

[cynatnite]

4. Yippee!!

:bounce: :toast: :bounce:

[npincus]

5. when? is that the 12PM document release?

[crispini]

8. We'll find out when it gets out!

She didn't say when.

[ewagner]

6. Wooohoooooo!

That's good...at least there will be a definitive answer about some of the questions we've been asking for two years.

[The Backlash Cometh]

15. Well, before the Fitzgerald Report, there was the Starr and the Ray Report

Because it wasn't incriminating enough against Clinton, the media didn't report much on it, except to allow the right-wingers to spin it the way they wanted it to be spun.

When the Fitzgerald Report comes out, I hope it's everything everybody here wants it to be.

[Supersedeas]

9. Betting Fitz is handing the political matter to the House to explore

[janx]

10. OMG n/t

[crispini]

11. DOH! SHE'S RETRACTING!

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.

"He is NOT going to be releasing ALL of the GJ material."

[crispini]

14. Just fucking put the letter up, Mitchell!

Points out that he is not a special council.

Does not have authority to disclose GJ material.

[MidwestTransplant]

12. SHE TAKES IT BACK. DUMB ASS

[JerseygirlCT]

13. NOPE

NOT going to give them a report. Mitchell just re-read and corrected herself.

Bad news, there, I'd say.

[emulatorloo]

16. I swear Andrea Mitchell has a reading comprehension problem

seems to misread many things and get em wrong:

http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/10/25/10387/276

[hertopos]

17. Can you explain what kind of report they asked?

nt

[crispini]

21. Dems asks for a full-blown report on investigations....

even IF there were no indictments.

[janx]

24. I don't think that's what Matthews/Mitchell were talking about. n/t

[MidwestTransplant]

18. I asked the other day why anybody would want her on their show

she has NOTHING to add ever.

[janx]

20. Matthews also said there was a report. n/t

[stop the bleeding]

22. Is there one or not?????????

[Gregorian]

23. OMG! I'm actually watching televised "news"!

It has been 20 years since I've watched the televised crap they call news.

Is Andrea Mitchell the wine soaked whore? She's a newscaster!?

[crispini]

26. If you're watching MSNBC, yes.

She's actually a reporter. so she doesn't have to look quite as blowdried as the rest.

[ticapnews]

27. The letter says Fitzgerald isn't authorized to release that kind of report

and that Congress has no authority to ask for one, since he was appointed by the DoJ. He is playing it very close to the vest.

As Tweety observed, he is running such a tight ship, if he had been working in the White House they might not be having these problems :P

[tularetom]

28. Andrea Mitchell is the worst POS on TV

ok, except russert, matthews, kookie roberts, blitzer, etc. I don't include amyone from faux news on my list because I have found that if you view it as a 24-hour "Daily Show" it becomes almost tolerable. Watching oreilly in one of his red faced rnats is almost as funny as a Jo Stewart monologue.