Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: No crime occurred until the prosecutor came to town

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:14 PM
Original message
MSNBC: No crime occurred until the prosecutor came to town
I think it was David Williams at the court house. He did say this is similar to what happened in Watergate and Whitewater: It's the coverup that gets people in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. No Shit Sherlock.....
If people would just come clean, the fallout would all be political and not political AND legal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. We don't know that yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. uh - wrong
this is part of the 'its not a crime its a technicality' meme.

First - it seems that a new GJ will be seated or the current one extended.

Second - just because there is no indictment for the Plame outing does not mean that no crime was committed, just that there is not enough evidence, right now, to justify an indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Correct.
The indictments only cover the current 5 counts. But there is material that shows Libby telling others that there were issues with the CIA that made responding to Wilson risky. Libby knew what he was doing was very wrong. Otherwise, he wouldn't have lied about it.

There is much more to come here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's just INSANE
So many crimes have occurred since Bush took office, including very very serious crimes of lying to Congress and to the UN, forging documents to justify invasion of a sovereign country, granting no-bid contracts to WH-connected companies...should I go on?

It's all tied to this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. If the bushiters were smart..and we know they're not
They should come clean right now, and
let * start over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. really, how about a war based on a LIE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lied into war, CIA op outed....but no crime. Everything was perfect.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wrong. It's the coverup that is easy to prosecute
You don't try to hide something if you did nothing wrong.

Lying to the GJ is easy to prove, that's why they go for the less complicated charge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Bingo!
"It's the coverup that is easy to prosecute."

I suppose Al Capone didn't commit any murders either? You prosecute based on the best evidence that is likely to convict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let me point out... It's the cover up that gets criminals convicted
You can't have a cover up without something to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's the coverup of lying about a crime that really gets them in trouble.
Why did Libby lie? He took a major risk when he did that. What is worth that risk?

That's what I want to know. That's what the American people, that's what the world has the right to know. And I hope that's what Fitzgerald wants to know, too, and I hope he has the ways and means and tenacity to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ya know, if there's nothing to hide you don't lie. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Uhhh..that was Pete Wilson..he used to WORK for Cheney!
Of course he would say that. His good buddy and former mentor and boss is up to his eyeballs in the muck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thanks. Too many David's at MSNBC...
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Watergate was already a crime (burglary) and also the shady
fund for playing dirty games...I think that was also illegal.

So no - Watergate was a whole slew of crimes... it is just the president who hadn't known about the break - in beforehand. His higher ups knew about the break-in and the CREEP funds... So there were crimes going on - and the crimes occured years before the investigation.

Whitewater...were there crimes? Well none that the Clinton's had anything to do with. And Paula Jones case was thrown out of court in the end. And having an affair with an intern is not a crime, but the FBI investigated that and put Monica on the spot and then asked Clinton questions and he lied about his affair. So - many years into the Whitewater thing -which had morphed into Paula Jones - then morphed into Monica - lying about Monica was how Clinton lied & broke the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. No crime occurred? Outing a COVERT CIA operative is TREASON.
No crime? They should be tried under the espionage act. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Dan Abrams is saying it is next to impossible to get a conviction
on the Espionage Act because of how it is written. He actually says that if Libby had gone to Fitzgerald and told the absolute truth from the beginning Fitz might not have been able to prosecute under Espionage Act because of the wording...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC