lovuian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:18 PM
Original message |
Breaking News Bar its written Libby recieved the information from |
|
CHENEY!!!
CNN Breaking News RED BAR!!!
|
meganmonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Butterflies on meth buzzing around my belly no, thanks! :P
:freak:
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
2. if you have been reading stuff on DU this is NOT breaking news. |
peacetalksforall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Getting it from Cheney is not a big deal because they were both cleared |
|
for high level intelligence. Some people believe that Libby gave it to Cheney and Libby received it from Feitz - of CIA and Bolton staff.
|
lovuian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. It is a BIG FREAKIN DEAL!!! Cheney has to go under OATH!!! |
|
Look at ABUSE OF POWER and OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!!!
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
4. cheney is allowed to tell libby this stuff, they both have clearances? nt |
lovuian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Excuse me where are you to know if they are allowed to CONSPIRE |
|
against a man to bring harm to his family!!!
GET A GRIP!!!
|
unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. not necessarily, it depends on WHY the conversation took place |
|
and also on what the instructions were.
disclosure of classified information requires not only the appropriate clearance, but also a "need to know". if libby didn't "need to know" about plame, then it's not legal for cheney to discuss it.
more severely, if cheney's instructions to libby were, hey, go leak this, then THAT is obviously seriously criminal.
so at a minimum, cheney's lawyer needs a good story as to why he had a legitimate need to tell libby. the fact that libby eventually (further) leaked it is prima facia evidence that cheney told him in order that he should leak it. if cheney can't come up with a plausible alternative story that's completely legitimate, then he's got a serious problem.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. good explanation. you said it good. |
lovuian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. Bingo UNBLOCK!!! and Mr.Cheney has to testify under oath!!! |
|
and is there anybody like ROVE who will testify that Cheney was about this whole thing!!!
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. if libby goes to trial. the VP would be a witness. but he could plea |
|
bargain. who knows at this point.
|
lovuian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. He will be under oath and heres the ??? will Cheney go??? |
|
I fear he will not go quietly!!!
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. yes, but what followed is what is important--what was the scheme to |
lovuian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
and this is conspiracy WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE PEOPLE!!!
|
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
7. This has been circulating around here for days. |
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message |
8. IT REALLY *IS* FITZMAS! |
|
HAPPY HAPPY JOY JOY!
The Admin is GOING DOWN!
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Maureen Dowd also mentioned in her column last Saturday. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |